Author
Listed:
- Jun Wang
(James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Genomics Institute
Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Jianguo Zhang
(Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Hongkun Zheng
(Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Jun Li
(Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Dongyuan Liu
(Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Heng Li
(Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Ram Samudrala
(Computation Genomics Group, University of Washington)
- Jun Yu
(James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Genomics Institute
Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Gane Ka-Shu Wong
(James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Genomics Institute
Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Washington Genome Center)
Abstract
(Arising from: Y. Okazaki et al. Nature 420, 563–573 200210.1038/nature01266 ; Okazaki et al. reply) Okazaki et al. have argued that as many as 15,815 of 33,409 non-redundant mouse complementary DNAs may represent functional RNA genes1, on the basis of their findings that some of these cDNAs are confirmed by expressed sequence tagging and are found near CpG islands or polyadenylation signals2 — although many are expressed at such low levels that they could not be detected by microarray analysis3. We show here that conservation of these ‘non-coding’ cDNAs in rats or humans is no better than in an evolutionarily neutral control. Our results indicate that they are either non-functional or, if they are functional, are specific to a given species.
Suggested Citation
Jun Wang & Jianguo Zhang & Hongkun Zheng & Jun Li & Dongyuan Liu & Heng Li & Ram Samudrala & Jun Yu & Gane Ka-Shu Wong, 2004.
"Neutral evolution of ‘non-coding’ complementary DNAs,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7010), pages 1-2, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:431:y:2004:i:7010:d:10.1038_nature03016
DOI: 10.1038/nature03016
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:431:y:2004:i:7010:d:10.1038_nature03016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.