Author
Listed:
- Stephen J. Elvin
(Defence Science and Technology Laboratories, Porton Down)
- E. Diane Williamson
(Defence Science and Technology Laboratories, Porton Down)
- Joanne C. Scott
(Defence Science and Technology Laboratories, Porton Down)
- Jeremy N. Smith
(Defence Science and Technology Laboratories, Porton Down)
- Guillermo Pérez de Lema
(Klinikum der Universität München, Medizinische Poliklinik–Innenstadt)
- Silvia Chilla
(Klinikum der Universität München, Medizinische Poliklinik–Innenstadt)
- Paul Clapham
(University of Massachusetts)
- Klaus Pfeffer
(Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf)
- Detlef Schlöndorff
(Klinikum der Universität München, Medizinische Poliklinik–Innenstadt)
- Bruno Luckow
(Klinikum der Universität München, Medizinische Poliklinik–Innenstadt)
Abstract
Arising from: J. Mecsas et al. Nature 427, 606 (2004) Mecsas and colleagues suggest that a deficiency in the chemokine receptor CCR5 in humans is unlikely to confer protection against plague, based on their study of Yersinia pestis infection in Ccr5-deficient mice1. They were testing the hypothesis that a mutation in the CCR5 gene, frequently found in Caucasians, may have been selected for in the past because it provided protection against (bubonic) plague2,3,4,5,6,7; the mutation, called CCR5Δ32, is characterized by a 32-base-pair deletion. We have also tested this hypothesis by using Y. pestis infection in mice and, in addition, we have done phagocytosis experiments with macrophages from wild-type and Ccr5-deficient mice. Although, like Mecsas et al., we did not see any difference in the survival of the two groups of mice, we did find that there was a significantly reduced uptake of Y. pestis by Ccr5-deficient macrophages in vitro. Our results indicate that the role of Ccr5 in Y. pestis infection may therefore be more complex than previously thought.
Suggested Citation
Stephen J. Elvin & E. Diane Williamson & Joanne C. Scott & Jeremy N. Smith & Guillermo Pérez de Lema & Silvia Chilla & Paul Clapham & Klaus Pfeffer & Detlef Schlöndorff & Bruno Luckow, 2004.
"Ambiguous role of CCR5 in Y. pestis infection,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6998), pages 418-418, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:430:y:2004:i:6998:d:10.1038_nature02822
DOI: 10.1038/nature02822
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:430:y:2004:i:6998:d:10.1038_nature02822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.