Author
Listed:
- Ian G. Dobbins
(Duke University)
- David M. Schnyer
(Boston VA Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, MGH/MIT/HMS)
- Mieke Verfaellie
(Boston VA Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine)
- Daniel L. Schacter
(Harvard University)
Abstract
Recent observation of objects speeds up their subsequent identification and classification1,2. This common form of learning, known as repetition priming, can operate in the absence of explicit memory for earlier experiences3,4, and functional neuroimaging has shown that object classification improved in this way is accompanied by ‘neural priming’ (reduced neural activity) in prefrontal, fusiform and other cortical regions5,6,7,8,9,10. These observations have led to suggestions that cortical representations of items undergo ‘tuning’, whereby neurons encoding irrelevant information respond less as a given object is observed repeatedly10, thereby facilitating future availability of pertinent object knowledge. Here we provide experimental support for an alternative hypothesis, in which reduced cortical activity occurs because subjects rapidly learn their previous responses11. After a primed object classification (such as ‘bigger than a shoebox’), cue reversal (‘smaller than a shoebox’) greatly slowed performance and completely eliminated neural priming in fusiform cortex, which suggests that these cortical item representations were no more available for primed objects than they were for new objects. In contrast, prefrontal cortex activity tracked behavioural priming and predicted the degree to which cue reversal would slow down object classification—highlighting the role of the prefrontal cortex in executive control.
Suggested Citation
Ian G. Dobbins & David M. Schnyer & Mieke Verfaellie & Daniel L. Schacter, 2004.
"Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6980), pages 316-319, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:428:y:2004:i:6980:d:10.1038_nature02400
DOI: 10.1038/nature02400
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:428:y:2004:i:6980:d:10.1038_nature02400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.