IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v422y2003i6934d10.1038_422834a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How did the metals in a giant star originate?

Author

Listed:
  • Piercarlo Bonifacio

    (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste)

  • Marco Limongi

    (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma)

  • Alessandro Chieffi

    (Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale, CNR)

Abstract

The chemical composition of stars with extremely low metal contents (taking 'metals' to mean all elements other than hydrogen and helium) provides us with information on the masses of the stars that produced the first metals. Such a direct connection is not possible, however, if the surface of the star has been polluted by enriched material, either dredged from the star's interior or transferred from a companion star. Here we argue that, in the case of HE0107–5240 (ref. 1), the most iron-poor star known, the oxygen abundance could be a discriminant: a ratio of [O/Fe] exceeding +3.5 would favour a pristine origin of metals, whereas an [O/Fe] ratio of less than +3 would favour the pollution hypothesis. Using this criterion, we suggest how the required information on oxygen abundance might be obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Piercarlo Bonifacio & Marco Limongi & Alessandro Chieffi, 2003. "How did the metals in a giant star originate?," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6934), pages 834-834, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:422:y:2003:i:6934:d:10.1038_422834a
    DOI: 10.1038/422834a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/422834a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/422834a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:422:y:2003:i:6934:d:10.1038_422834a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.