IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v408y2000i6814d10.1038_35048669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What you see is what you hear

Author

Listed:
  • Ladan Shams

    (California Institute of Technology Division of Biology)

  • Yukiyasu Kamitani

    (California Institute of Technology Division of Biology)

  • Shinsuke Shimojo

    (California Institute of Technology Division of Biology
    NTT Communication Science Laboratories, Human and Information Science Laboratory)

Abstract

Vision is believed to dominate our multisensory perception of the world. Here we overturn this established view by showing that auditory information can qualitatively alter the perception of an unambiguous visual stimulus to create a striking visual illusion. Our findings indicate that visual perception can be manipulated by other sensory modalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ladan Shams & Yukiyasu Kamitani & Shinsuke Shimojo, 2000. "What you see is what you hear," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6814), pages 788-788, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6814:d:10.1038_35048669
    DOI: 10.1038/35048669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35048669
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35048669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wendy J Adams, 2016. "The Development of Audio-Visual Integration for Temporal Judgements," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Yasuhiro Takeshima & Jiro Gyoba, 2015. "Different Effects of Attentional Mechanisms between Visual and Auditory Cueing," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(3), pages 176-176, September.
    3. Yoshiaki Tsushima & Sho Okada & Yuka Kawai & Akio Sumita & Hiroshi Ando & Mitsunori Miki, 2020. "Effect of illumination on perceived temperature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-8, August.
    4. Alice Masini & Marcello Lanari & Sofia Marini & Alessia Tessari & Stefania Toselli & Rita Stagni & Maria Cristina Bisi & Laura Bragonzoni & Davide Gori & Alessandra Sansavini & Andrea Ceciliani & Laur, 2020. "A Multiple Targeted Research Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Trial in Primary School Children Based on an Active Break Intervention: The Imola Active Breaks (I-MOVE) Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Kiyohito Iigaya & Sanghyun Yi & Iman A. Wahle & Sandy Tanwisuth & Logan Cross & John P. O’Doherty, 2023. "Neural mechanisms underlying the hierarchical construction of perceived aesthetic value," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Erik Van der Burg & John Cass & Christian N L Olivers & Jan Theeuwes & David Alais, 2010. "Efficient Visual Search from Synchronized Auditory Signals Requires Transient Audiovisual Events," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Benjamin de Haas & Roberto Cecere & Harriet Cullen & Jon Driver & Vincenzo Romei, 2013. "The Duration of a Co-Occurring Sound Modulates Visual Detection Performance in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, January.
    8. Pavel Kraikivski, 2022. "A Dynamic Mechanistic Model of Perceptual Binding," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Hauke S Meyerhoff & Nina A Gehrer, 2017. "Visuo-perceptual capabilities predict sensitivity for coinciding auditory and visual transients in multi-element displays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Sarah E Donohue & Lawrence G Appelbaum & Christina J Park & Kenneth C Roberts & Marty G Woldorff, 2013. "Cross-Modal Stimulus Conflict: The Behavioral Effects of Stimulus Input Timing in a Visual-Auditory Stroop Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Noelle R B Stiles & Monica Li & Carmel A Levitan & Yukiyasu Kamitani & Shinsuke Shimojo, 2018. "What you saw is what you will hear: Two new illusions with audiovisual postdictive effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6814:d:10.1038_35048669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.