IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v395y1998i6697d10.1038_25731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When temporal terms belie conceptual order

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas F. Münte

    (University of California
    Medizinische Hochschule Hannover)

  • Kolja Schiltz

    (University of California)

  • Marta Kutas

    (University of California
    University of California)

Abstract

We conceive of time as a sequential order of real-world events, one event following another from past to present to future. This conception colours the way we speak of time (“we look forward to the time”) and, as we show here, the way we process written statements referring to the temporal order of events, in real time.Terms such as ‘before’ and ‘after’ give us the linguistic freedom to express a series of events (real or imaginary) in any order. However, sentences that present events out of chronological order require additional discourse-level computation. Here we examine how and when these computations are carried out by contrasting brain potentials across two sentence types that differonly in their initial word (‘After’ X, Y versus ‘Before’ X,Y). At sites on the left frontal scalp, the responses to ‘before’ and ‘after'sentences diverge within 300 ms; the size of this difference increases over the course of the sentences and is correlated with individual working-memory spans. Thus, we show that there areimmediate and lasting consequences for neural processing of the discourse implications of a single word on sentence comprehension.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas F. Münte & Kolja Schiltz & Marta Kutas, 1998. "When temporal terms belie conceptual order," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6697), pages 71-73, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:395:y:1998:i:6697:d:10.1038_25731
    DOI: 10.1038/25731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/25731
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/25731?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:395:y:1998:i:6697:d:10.1038_25731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.