IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v395y1998i6697d10.1038_25653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer

Author

Listed:
  • S. Dürr

    (Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz)

  • T. Nonn

    (Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz)

  • G. Rempe

    (Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz)

Abstract

The principle of complementarity refers to the ability of quantum-mechanical entities to behave as particles or waves under different experimental conditions. For example, in the famous double-slit experiment, a single electron can apparently pass through both apertures simultaneously, forming an interference pattern. But if a ‘which-way’ detector is employed to determine the particle's path, the interference pattern is destroyed. This is usually explained in terms of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, in which the acquisition of spatial information increases the uncertainty in the particle's momentum, thus destroying the interference. Here we report a which-way experiment in an atom interferometer in which the ‘back action’ of path detection on the atom's momentum is too small to explain the disappearance of the interference pattern. We attribute it instead to correlations between the which-way detector and the atomic motion, rather than to the uncertainty principle.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Dürr & T. Nonn & G. Rempe, 1998. "Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6697), pages 33-37, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:395:y:1998:i:6697:d:10.1038_25653
    DOI: 10.1038/25653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/25653
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/25653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:395:y:1998:i:6697:d:10.1038_25653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.