IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v394y1998i6693d10.1038_28982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Roman “implant” reconsidered

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Crubézy

    (Fédération d'Anthropologie, Université Paul Sabatier)

  • Pascal Murail

    (Laboratoire d'Anthropologie)

  • Louis Girard

    (Laboratoire d'Anthropologie)

  • Jean-Pierre Bernadou

    (Ecole Nationale Supérieure de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace)

Abstract

Crubézy et al. reply — We disagree with Becker's view that the dental implant described in our earlier Scientific Correspondence 1 is a natural canine stained with iron oxides. The dental implant was located in a position normally taken by the upper second right premolar, a position in which a normal canine would not be found. Furthermore, the only goods associated with this burial were pottery, not iron or any metal objects2. Even if there had been iron oxide contamination, it is unlikely that it would have affected only one tooth. Figure 1a in our earlier Scientific Correspondence shows that the piece of metal is corroded on its periphery; the “smooth, intact surface” observed on the X-ray is a common artefact of the technique. Finally, we have already noted that the implant was broken and that metallurgical analysis unambiguously identifies it as metal and not as a biological tissue.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Crubézy & Pascal Murail & Louis Girard & Jean-Pierre Bernadou, 1998. "A Roman “implant” reconsidered," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6693), pages 534-534, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:394:y:1998:i:6693:d:10.1038_28982
    DOI: 10.1038/28982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/28982
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/28982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:394:y:1998:i:6693:d:10.1038_28982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.