IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v390y1997i6659d10.1038_37307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evershed effect in sunspots as a siphon flow along a magnetic flux tube

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamín Montesinos

    (LAEFF/INTA
    IAA/CSIC)

  • John H. Thomas

    (University of Rochester)

Abstract

The Evershed effect1—a wavelength shift and profile asymmetry in the spectral lines observed from the outer regions of sunspots (the penumbra)—has been interpreted as a radial outflow of gas from the sunspot, but the dynamics of the flow have not been fully understood2. Although the Evershed effect seems to stop abruptly at the outer edge of the penumbra, the outflow itself must continue, though tracing its path has proved difficult. Theoretical3,4 and observational5,6,7 studies have suggested that much of the continuing flow may follow magnetic field lines that go below the visible surface of the Sun at or just beyond the edge of the penumbra, and recent observations have now confirmed this picture8. Here we show, using theoretical calculations based on a more realistic model, that the flow acts like a siphon3,9,10,11,12 which is driven along a magnetic flux tube by the pressure drop between the endpoints of the tube.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamín Montesinos & John H. Thomas, 1997. "The Evershed effect in sunspots as a siphon flow along a magnetic flux tube," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6659), pages 485-487, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:390:y:1997:i:6659:d:10.1038_37307
    DOI: 10.1038/37307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/37307
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/37307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:390:y:1997:i:6659:d:10.1038_37307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.