IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v5y2022i10d10.1038_s41893-022-00932-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of protected areas influenced by socio-economic context

Author

Listed:
  • Tsegaye T. Gatiso

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
    Bonn University)

  • Lars Kulik

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Mona Bachmann

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
    University of Copenhagen)

  • Aletta Bonn

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig
    Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research—UFZ, Department of Ecosystem Services
    Friedrich Schiller University Jena)

  • Lukas Bösch

    (University Leipzig)

  • Dustin Eirdosh

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Andreas Freytag

    (Friedrich Schiller University Jena
    Stellenbosch University)

  • Susan Hanisch

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Marco Heurich

    (Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg
    Department of Visitor Management and National Park Management, Bavarian Forest National Park
    Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Campus Evenstad)

  • Tenekwetche Sop

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Karsten Wesche

    (Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz
    Technische Universität Dresden)

  • Marten Winter

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig
    Leipzig University)

  • Hjalmar S. Kühl

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

Abstract

Protected area (PA) performance is thought to depend on effective conservation management and favourable socio-economic context. However, increasing evidence of continued biodiversity decline within PAs raises the question of whether fundamental ecological and socio-economic constraints might actually affect PA effectiveness. Here we quantify how threats to biodiversity, socio-economic context and conservation efforts play out across 114 PAs in 25 European and African countries. We found that even in the presence of highly favourable socio-economic context and conservation efforts, it is not possible to completely offset the intensity of threats and prevent biodiversity decline. Projections show that halting biodiversity decline across the studied PA network may require at least a 35% increase in conservation efforts over a decade. However, as PAs approach zero biodiversity loss, even greater efforts and resources would be needed because of the principle of diminishing marginal returns. Our findings point to limited effectiveness of PAs and their management that might not be possible to address by simply increasing resources. Additionally, the adoption of core design principles of sustainable systems that take into account the social–ecological contexts of PAs could help overcome the observed hurdles of limited effectiveness and thus better integrate PAs into sustainable development efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsegaye T. Gatiso & Lars Kulik & Mona Bachmann & Aletta Bonn & Lukas Bösch & Dustin Eirdosh & Andreas Freytag & Susan Hanisch & Marco Heurich & Tenekwetche Sop & Karsten Wesche & Marten Winter & Hjalm, 2022. "Effectiveness of protected areas influenced by socio-economic context," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 861-868, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:5:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1038_s41893-022-00932-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00932-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-022-00932-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-022-00932-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:5:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1038_s41893-022-00932-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.