Author
Listed:
- Eléonore Rolland
(University of Lyon (CNRS UMR 5229)
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Cote d’Ivoire
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)
- Oscar Nodé-Langlois
(University of Lyon (CNRS UMR 5229)
Cote d’Ivoire
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)
- Patrick J. Tkaczynski
(Liverpool John Moores University)
- Cédric Girard-Buttoz
(Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Cote d’Ivoire
University of Saint-Etienne (CNRS, Inserm))
- Holly Rayson
(University of Lyon 1 (CNRS UMR 5229))
- Catherine Crockford
(University of Lyon (CNRS UMR 5229)
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Cote d’Ivoire)
- Roman M. Wittig
(University of Lyon (CNRS UMR 5229)
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Cote d’Ivoire)
Abstract
Human attachment theory outlines three organized types: secure, insecure avoidant and insecure resistant, all considered adaptive responses to maternal care for offspring survival. In contrast, disorganized attachment is hypothesized to be maladaptive and therefore uncommon in wild mammals, though this remains untested. We assessed attachment types in 50 wild chimpanzees (ages 0–10 years) in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Using 3,795 h of mother and offspring focal observations, we found no behaviours indicative of disorganized attachment. To explore organized attachment, we analysed a subset of 18 immature chimpanzees and their behavioural responses to 309 natural threatening events. Their responses showed organized attachment patterns: some sought maternal closeness (secure-like), while others displayed independence (insecure avoidant-like). Our study supports the hypothesis that organized attachment types are adaptive and have a long evolutionary history.
Suggested Citation
Eléonore Rolland & Oscar Nodé-Langlois & Patrick J. Tkaczynski & Cédric Girard-Buttoz & Holly Rayson & Catherine Crockford & Roman M. Wittig, 2025.
"Evidence of organized but not disorganized attachment in wild Western chimpanzee offspring (Pan troglodytes verus),"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(8), pages 1571-1582, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02176-8
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02176-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02176-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.