IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v9y2025i7d10.1038_s41562-025-02162-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and potential of mobile interventions for stress management

Author

Listed:
  • Huanya Zhu

    (Peking University)

  • Qiang Chen

    (Peking University)

  • Shijuan Wei

    (Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Xuebing Wu

    (Peking University)

  • Qianqian Ju

    (Peking University)

  • Jinmeng Liu

    (Peking University)

  • Yiqun Gan

    (Peking University)

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of stress underscores the demand for effective, self-administered mobile mental health interventions, yet their efficacy and accessibility are still unclear. Here, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to classify self-administered mobile stress management interventions, compare their efficacy and examine their moderators. We searched PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycARTICLES from database inception to 20 November 2023. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials on peer-reviewed, Internet-based, self-administered psychological interventions for stress reduction in healthy or subhealthy adults. A total of 63 studies with 20,454 participants were included (68.18% female; mean age 39.14 years). Integrated expert insights with large language models to develop a three-dimensional framework encompassing theoretical foundation, human support and mobile technology. Intervention labels were independently coded by the authors and ChatGPT. The included studies’ quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis and Bayesian meta-regression were used to explore comparative efficacy and potential moderators. The framework classified and compared 19 mobile stress interventions, identifying key moderating factors for optimization. Stress management programmes, problem-solving therapy and mindfulness meditation ranked the top. There was no conclusive evidence that human support or mobile technology significantly enhanced intervention outcomes. The evidence is subject to sex imbalance and quality risk, while the limited statistical power of meta-regression warrants caution in interpreting moderator effects. Our findings provide insights for designing more effective and scalable stress interventions and offer promising strategies to reduce health service disparities and advance the Sustainable Development Goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Huanya Zhu & Qiang Chen & Shijuan Wei & Xuebing Wu & Qianqian Ju & Jinmeng Liu & Yiqun Gan, 2025. "A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis on the efficacy and potential of mobile interventions for stress management," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 1431-1441, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02162-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02162-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02162-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-025-02162-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02162-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.