IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v9y2025i4d10.1038_s41562-024-02097-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare use in 12–18-year-old adolescents vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 versus unvaccinated in a national register-based Danish cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Selina Kikkenborg Berg

    (Copenhagen University Hospital
    University of Copenhagen)

  • Helle Wallach-Kildemoes

    (Copenhagen University Hospital)

  • Line Ryberg Rasmussen

    (Copenhagen University Hospital)

  • Ulrikka Nygaard

    (University of Copenhagen
    Copenhagen University Hospital)

  • Nina Marie Birk

    (Copenhagen University Hospital)

  • Henning Bundgaard

    (Copenhagen University Hospital
    University of Copenhagen)

  • Annette Kjær Ersbøll

    (University of Southern Denmark)

  • Lau Caspar Thygesen

    (University of Southern Denmark)

  • Susanne Dam Nielsen

    (University of Copenhagen
    Copenhagen University Hospital)

  • Anne Vinggaard Christensen

    (Copenhagen University Hospital)

Abstract

Healthcare use among adolescents after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. In a real-life register-based cohort study (trial NCT04786353), healthcare use was compared among Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated 12–18-year-olds. First-dose-vaccinated (between 1 May and 30 September 2021) adolescents were sex and age matched 1:1 with unvaccinated adolescents. Outcomes were visits to emergency rooms, hospitalization, and visits to general practitioners and specialist practitioners. The prior event rate ratio (PERR) was applied. The study finds that boys had fewer visits to general practitioners (PERR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.99) after the first vaccine. Up to 56 days after the second dose, vaccinated boys had lower rates of visits to specialist practitioners (0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99); after 57–182 days, vaccinated girls and boys had higher rates of visits to emergency rooms (1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.39; 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.31) and to general practitioners (1.17, 95% CI 1.12–1.21; 1.17, 95% CI 1.13–1.22). Furthermore, vaccinated boys had higher rates of visits to specialist practitioners (1.23, 95% CI 1.08–1.39). Estimates were close to one and do not indicate that BNT162b2 leads to a practically meaningful increase in healthcare use among vaccinated adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Selina Kikkenborg Berg & Helle Wallach-Kildemoes & Line Ryberg Rasmussen & Ulrikka Nygaard & Nina Marie Birk & Henning Bundgaard & Annette Kjær Ersbøll & Lau Caspar Thygesen & Susanne Dam Nielsen & An, 2025. "Healthcare use in 12–18-year-old adolescents vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 versus unvaccinated in a national register-based Danish cohort," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(4), pages 737-745, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1038_s41562-024-02097-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02097-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-02097-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-024-02097-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1038_s41562-024-02097-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.