Author
Listed:
- Amit Goldenberg
(Harvard Department of Psychology, Harvard University
Harvard Institute of Digital Data and Design, Harvard Science and Engineering Complex
Harvard University, Harvard Business School)
- Joseph M. Abruzzo
(Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management)
- Zi Huang
(Harvard University, Harvard Business School)
- Jonas Schöne
(University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology)
- David Bailey
(Harvard University, Harvard Business School)
- Robb Willer
(Stanford University, Department of Sociology)
- Eran Halperin
(Hebrew University, Department of Psychology)
- James J. Gross
(Stanford University, Department of Psychology)
Abstract
Political segregation is an important social problem, increasing polarization and impeding effective governance. Previous work has viewed the central driver of segregation to be political homophily, the tendency to associate with others who have similar views. Here we propose that, in addition to homophily, people’s social tie decisions are driven by political acrophily, the tendency to associate with others who have more extreme political views (rather than more moderate). We examined this using a paradigm in which participants share emotions and attitudes on political policies, observe others’ responses and choose which others to affiliate with. In four studies (N = 1,235), both liberal and conservative participants’ social tie decisions reflected the presence of acrophily. We found that participants who viewed peers who expressed more extreme views as more prototypical of their political group also tended to engage in greater acrophily. These studies identify a previously overlooked tendency in tie formation.
Suggested Citation
Amit Goldenberg & Joseph M. Abruzzo & Zi Huang & Jonas Schöne & David Bailey & Robb Willer & Eran Halperin & James J. Gross, 2023.
"Homophily and acrophily as drivers of political segregation,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 219-230, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01474-9
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01474-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01474-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.