IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v5y2021i7d10.1038_s41562-021-01130-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rise of affectivism

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Dukes

    (University of Geneva
    University of Fribourg)

  • Kathryn Abrams

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Ralph Adolphs

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Mohammed E. Ahmed

    (University of Houston)

  • Andrew Beatty

    (Brunel University London)

  • Kent C. Berridge

    (University of Michigan)

  • Susan Broomhall

    (Australian Catholic University)

  • Tobias Brosch

    (University of Geneva
    University of Geneva)

  • Joseph J. Campos

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Zanna Clay

    (Durham University)

  • Fabrice Clément

    (University of Neuchâtel)

  • William A. Cunningham

    (University of Toronto)

  • Antonio Damasio

    (University of Southern California)

  • Hanna Damasio

    (University of Southern California)

  • Justin D’Arms

    (Ohio State University)

  • Jane W. Davidson

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Beatrice Gelder

    (Maastricht University
    University College London)

  • Julien Deonna

    (University of Geneva
    University of Geneva)

  • Ronnie Sousa

    (University of Toronto)

  • Paul Ekman

    (University of California, San Francisco
    Paul Ekman Group)

  • Phoebe C. Ellsworth

    (University of Michigan)

  • Ernst Fehr

    (University of Zurich)

  • Agneta Fischer

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Ad Foolen

    (Radboud University)

  • Ute Frevert

    (Max Planck Institute for Human Development)

  • Didier Grandjean

    (University of Geneva
    University of Geneva)

  • Jonathan Gratch

    (University of Southern California)

  • Leslie Greenberg

    (York University)

  • Patricia Greenspan

    (University of Maryland)

  • James J. Gross

    (Stanford University)

  • Eran Halperin

    (Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

  • Arvid Kappas

    (Jacobs University Bremen)

  • Dacher Keltner

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Brian Knutson

    (Stanford University)

  • David Konstan

    (New York University)

  • Mariska E. Kret

    (Leiden University)

  • Joseph E. LeDoux

    (New York University)

  • Jennifer S. Lerner

    (Harvard University)

  • Robert W. Levenson

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • George Loewenstein

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Antony S. R. Manstead

    (Cardiff University)

  • Terry A. Maroney

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Agnes Moors

    (KU Leuven)

  • Paula Niedenthal

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Brian Parkinson

    (University of Oxford)

  • Ioannis Pavlidis

    (University of Houston)

  • Catherine Pelachaud

    (CNRS-Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique, Sorbonne University)

  • Seth D. Pollak

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Gilles Pourtois

    (Ghent University)

  • Birgitt Roettger-Roessler

    (Freie Universität)

  • James A. Russell

    (Boston College)

  • Disa Sauter

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Andrea Scarantino

    (Georgia State University)

  • Klaus R. Scherer

    (University of Geneva
    University of Munich)

  • Peter Stearns

    (George Mason University)

  • Jan E. Stets

    (University of California, Riverside)

  • Christine Tappolet

    (Université de Montréal)

  • Fabrice Teroni

    (University of Geneva
    University of Geneva)

  • Jeanne Tsai

    (Stanford University)

  • Jonathan Turner

    (University of California, Riverside)

  • Carien Van Reekum

    (University of Reading)

  • Patrik Vuilleumier

    (University of Geneva
    University Medical School, University of Geneva)

  • Tim Wharton

    (University of Brighton)

  • David Sander

    (University of Geneva
    University of Geneva)

Abstract

Research over the past decades has demonstrated the explanatory power of emotions, feelings, motivations, moods, and other affective processes when trying to understand and predict how we think and behave. In this consensus article, we ask: has the increasingly recognized impact of affective phenomena ushered in a new era, the era of affectivism?

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Dukes & Kathryn Abrams & Ralph Adolphs & Mohammed E. Ahmed & Andrew Beatty & Kent C. Berridge & Susan Broomhall & Tobias Brosch & Joseph J. Campos & Zanna Clay & Fabrice Clément & William A. Cu, 2021. "The rise of affectivism," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(7), pages 816-820, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-021-01130-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01130-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian Gill & others, "undated". "In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ac30d0619fd64793b2e1b108d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Dorison, Charles A & Lerner, Jennifer S & Heller, Blake H & Rothman, Alexander J & Kawachi, Ichiro I & Wang, Ke & Rees, Vaughan W & Gill, Brian P & Gibbs, Nancy & Ebersole, Charles R & Vally, Zahir & , 2022. "In COVID-19 health messaging, loss framing increases anxiety with little-to-no concomitant benefits : Experimental evidence from 84 countries," Other publications TiSEM 235f67b6-6be5-4061-8693-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-021-01130-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.