IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natene/v9y2024i12d10.1038_s41560-024-01639-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing cathode–electrolyte interphases in batteries

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Xiao

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
    University of Washington)

  • Nicole Adelstein

    (San Francisco State University)

  • Yujing Bi

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

  • Wenjuan Bian

    (Idaho National Laboratory)

  • Jordi Cabana

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Corie L. Cobb

    (University of Washington)

  • Yi Cui

    (SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
    Stanford University)

  • Shen J. Dillon

    (University of California Irvine)

  • Marca M. Doeff

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  • Saiful M. Islam

    (Jackson State University)

  • Kevin Leung

    (Sandia National Laboratories)

  • Mengya Li

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Feng Lin

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Jun Liu

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
    University of Washington)

  • Hongmei Luo

    (New Mexico State University)

  • Amy C. Marschilok

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory
    Stony Brook University)

  • Ying Shirley Meng

    (University of Chicago)

  • Yue Qi

    (Brown University)

  • Ritu Sahore

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Kayla G. Sprenger

    (University of Colorado Boulder)

  • Robert C. Tenent

    (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

  • Michael F. Toney

    (University of Colorado Boulder)

  • Wei Tong

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  • Liwen F. Wan

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Chongmin Wang

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

  • Stephen E. Weitzner

    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

  • Bingbin Wu

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

  • Yaobin Xu

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

Abstract

The cathode–electrolyte interphase plays a pivotal role in determining the usable capacity and cycling stability of electrochemical cells, yet it is overshadowed by its counterpart, the solid–electrolyte interphase. This is primarily due to the prevalence of side reactions, particularly at low potentials on the negative electrode, especially in state-of-the-art Li-ion batteries where the charge cutoff voltage is limited. However, as the quest for high-energy battery technologies intensifies, there is a pressing need to advance the study of cathode–electrolyte interphase properties. Here, we present a comprehensive approach to analyse the cathode–electrolyte interphase in battery systems. We underscore the importance of employing model cathode materials and coin cell protocols to establish baseline performance. Additionally, we delve into the factors behind the inconsistent and occasionally controversial findings related to the cathode–electrolyte interphase. We also address the challenges and opportunities in characterizing and simulating the cathode–electrolyte interphase, offering potential solutions to enhance its relevance to real-world applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Xiao & Nicole Adelstein & Yujing Bi & Wenjuan Bian & Jordi Cabana & Corie L. Cobb & Yi Cui & Shen J. Dillon & Marca M. Doeff & Saiful M. Islam & Kevin Leung & Mengya Li & Feng Lin & Jun Liu & Hong, 2024. "Assessing cathode–electrolyte interphases in batteries," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(12), pages 1463-1473, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:9:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41560-024-01639-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41560-024-01639-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-024-01639-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41560-024-01639-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:9:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41560-024-01639-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.