Author
Listed:
- Qiang Wang
(Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process (Ministry of Education), College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University)
- Jie Fan
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Mei-Po Kwan
(The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Utrecht University)
- Kan Zhou
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Guofeng Shen
(Peking University)
- Na Li
(Jimei University)
- Bowei Wu
(Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process (Ministry of Education), College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University)
- Jian Lin
(University of California)
Abstract
Since 2013, China has initiated a rapid energy transition that replaces traditional solid fuels with modern clean energy. Despite the tremendous success of the energy transition, its impacts on household energy costs and associated energy inequality remain largely unexplored. Here we use data from a large nationwide household survey to investigate these trends. We find that about two-fifths (43.0%) of surveyed households switched from traditional solid fuels to clean energy during 2013–2017. However, 56.1% to ~61.0% of them were from extremely poor or poor households, causing deep concern for increasing household energy burden. Accordingly, the share of surveyed households in energy poverty increased from 30.1% to 34.2%. Despite the declining inequality in energy cost, a growing inequality in energy burden was revealed during 2013–2017. Our results demonstrate that the energy burden on rural households increased due to the dramatic rise in the cost of clean energy, while urban households tend to spend a lower and decreased proportion of their income on energy.
Suggested Citation
Qiang Wang & Jie Fan & Mei-Po Kwan & Kan Zhou & Guofeng Shen & Na Li & Bowei Wu & Jian Lin, 2023.
"Examining energy inequality under the rapid residential energy transition in China through household surveys,"
Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 251-263, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natene:v:8:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1038_s41560-023-01193-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-023-01193-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:8:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1038_s41560-023-01193-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.