IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v8y2017i1d10.1038_s41467-017-02246-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduced biomass burning emissions reconcile conflicting estimates of the post-2006 atmospheric methane budget

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Worden

    (California Institute for Technology)

  • A. Anthony Bloom

    (California Institute for Technology)

  • Sudhanshu Pandey

    (Utrecht University
    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research)

  • Zhe Jiang

    (California Institute for Technology
    National Center for Atmospheric Research)

  • Helen M. Worden

    (National Center for Atmospheric Research)

  • Thomas W. Walker

    (California Institute for Technology)

  • Sander Houweling

    (Utrecht University
    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Thomas Röckmann

    (Utrecht University)

Abstract

Several viable but conflicting explanations have been proposed to explain the recent ~8 p.p.b. per year increase in atmospheric methane after 2006, equivalent to net emissions increase of ~25 Tg CH4 per year. A concurrent increase in atmospheric ethane implicates a fossil source; a concurrent decrease in the heavy isotope content of methane points toward a biogenic source, while other studies propose a decrease in the chemical sink (OH). Here we show that biomass burning emissions of methane decreased by 3.7 (±1.4) Tg CH4 per year from the 2001–2007 to the 2008–2014 time periods using satellite measurements of CO and CH4, nearly twice the decrease expected from prior estimates. After updating both the total and isotopic budgets for atmospheric methane with these revised biomass burning emissions (and assuming no change to the chemical sink), we find that fossil fuels contribute between 12–19 Tg CH4 per year to the recent atmospheric methane increase, thus reconciling the isotopic- and ethane-based results.

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Worden & A. Anthony Bloom & Sudhanshu Pandey & Zhe Jiang & Helen M. Worden & Thomas W. Walker & Sander Houweling & Thomas Röckmann, 2017. "Reduced biomass burning emissions reconcile conflicting estimates of the post-2006 atmospheric methane budget," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-02246-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02246-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-02246-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.