IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v5y2014i1d10.1038_ncomms5048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homeostatic control of polo-like kinase-1 engenders non-genetic heterogeneity in G2 checkpoint fidelity and timing

Author

Listed:
  • Hongqing Liang

    (Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road
    Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Biopolis Drive
    Bioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science Technology and Research)

  • Alessandro Esposito

    (Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road)

  • Siddharth De

    (Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road)

  • Suzan Ber

    (Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road)

  • Philippe Collin

    (Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge)

  • Uttam Surana

    (Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Biopolis Drive
    Bioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science Technology and Research)

  • Ashok R. Venkitaraman

    (Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road)

Abstract

The G2 checkpoint monitors DNA damage, preventing mitotic entry until the damage can be resolved. The mechanisms controlling checkpoint recovery are unclear. Here, we identify non-genetic heterogeneity in the fidelity and timing of damage-induced G2 checkpoint enforcement in individual cells from the same population. Single-cell fluorescence imaging reveals that individual damaged cells experience varying durations of G2 arrest, and recover with varying levels of remaining checkpoint signal or DNA damage. A gating mechanism dependent on polo-like kinase-1 (PLK1) activity underlies this heterogeneity. PLK1 activity continually accumulates from initial levels in G2-arrested cells, at a rate inversely correlated to checkpoint activation, until it reaches a threshold allowing mitotic entry regardless of remaining checkpoint signal or DNA damage. Thus, homeostatic control of PLK1 by the dynamic opposition between checkpoint signalling and pro-mitotic activities heterogeneously enforces the G2 checkpoint in each individual cell, with implications for cancer pathogenesis and therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongqing Liang & Alessandro Esposito & Siddharth De & Suzan Ber & Philippe Collin & Uttam Surana & Ashok R. Venkitaraman, 2014. "Homeostatic control of polo-like kinase-1 engenders non-genetic heterogeneity in G2 checkpoint fidelity and timing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:5:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms5048
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5048
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms5048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:5:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms5048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.