Author
Listed:
- Erik Gustafsson
(Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/CNPS CNRS UMR8195
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Neurosciences Paris-Sud UMR8195)
- Florence Levréro
(Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/CNPS CNRS UMR8195
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Neurosciences Paris-Sud UMR8195)
- David Reby
(Mammal Vocal Communication and Cognition Research, School of Psychology, University of Sussex)
- Nicolas Mathevon
(Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne, Equipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/CNPS CNRS UMR8195
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Neurosciences Paris-Sud UMR8195)
Abstract
Previous investigations of parents’ abilities to recognize the cries of their own babies have identified substantial and significant sex differences, with mothers showing greater correct recognition rates than fathers. Such sex differences in parenting abilities are common in non-human mammals and usually attributed to differential evolutionary pressures on male and female parental investment. However, in humans the traditional concept of ‘maternal instinct’ has received little empirical support and is incongruous given our evolutionary past as cooperative breeders. Here we use a controlled experimental design to show that both fathers and mothers can reliably and equally recognize their own baby from their cries, and that the only crucial factor affecting this ability is the amount of time spent by the parent with their own baby. These results highlight the importance of exposure and learning in the development of this ability, which may rely on shared auditory and cognitive abilities rather than sex-specific innate predispositions.
Suggested Citation
Erik Gustafsson & Florence Levréro & David Reby & Nicolas Mathevon, 2013.
"Fathers are just as good as mothers at recognizing the cries of their baby,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, June.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:4:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms2713
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2713
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:4:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms2713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.