Author
Listed:
- Shawn L. Chavez
(Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine)
- Kevin E. Loewke
(Auxogyn, Inc.)
- Jinnuo Han
(Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine)
- Farshid Moussavi
(Auxogyn, Inc.)
- Pere Colls
(Reprogenetics)
- Santiago Munne
(Reprogenetics)
- Barry Behr
(Stanford University School of Medicine)
- Renee A. Reijo Pera
(Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine)
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that aneuploidy in human embryos is surprisingly frequent with 50–80% of cleavage-stage human embryos carrying an abnormal chromosome number. Here we combine non-invasive time-lapse imaging with karyotypic reconstruction of all blastomeres in four-cell human embryos to address the hypothesis that blastomere behaviour may reflect ploidy during the first two cleavage divisions. We demonstrate that precise cell cycle parameter timing is observed in all euploid embryos to the four-cell stage, whereas only 30% of aneuploid embryos exhibit parameter values within normal timing windows. Further, we observe that the generation of human embryonic aneuploidy is complex with contribution from chromosome-containing fragments/micronuclei that frequently emerge and may persist or become reabsorbed during interphase. These findings suggest that cell cycle and fragmentation parameters of individual blastomeres are diagnostic of ploidy, amenable to automated tracking algorithms, and likely of clinical relevance in reducing transfer of embryos prone to miscarriage.
Suggested Citation
Shawn L. Chavez & Kevin E. Loewke & Jinnuo Han & Farshid Moussavi & Pere Colls & Santiago Munne & Barry Behr & Renee A. Reijo Pera, 2012.
"Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 1-12, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:3:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms2249
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2249
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:3:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms2249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.