IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v3y2012i1d10.1038_ncomms1631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Tomamichel

    (Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich)

  • Charles Ci Wen Lim

    (Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva)

  • Nicolas Gisin

    (Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva)

  • Renato Renner

    (Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich)

Abstract

Despite enormous theoretical and experimental progress in quantum cryptography, the security of most current implementations of quantum key distribution is still not rigorously established. One significant problem is that the security of the final key strongly depends on the number, M, of signals exchanged between the legitimate parties. Yet, existing security proofs are often only valid asymptotically, for unrealistically large values of M. Another challenge is that most security proofs are very sensitive to small differences between the physical devices used by the protocol and the theoretical model used to describe them. Here we show that these gaps between theory and experiment can be simultaneously overcome by using a recently developed proof technique based on the uncertainty relation for smooth entropies.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Tomamichel & Charles Ci Wen Lim & Nicolas Gisin & Renato Renner, 2012. "Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 1-6, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:3:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms1631
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms1631
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms1631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:3:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms1631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.