IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v2y2011i1d10.1038_ncomms1417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs

Author

Listed:
  • Hamilton E. Farris

    (Neuroscience Center and Kresge Hearing Labs, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center)

  • Michael J. Ryan

    (Section of Integrative Biology, 1 University Station C0930, University of Texas
    Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute)

Abstract

Whereas many studies on mate choice have measured the relative attractiveness of acoustic sexual signals, there is little understanding of another critical process: grouping and assigning the signals to their sources. For female túngara frogs, assigning the distinct components of male calls to the correct source is a challenge because males sing in aggregations, producing overlapping calls that lead to perceptual errors analogous to those of the 'cocktail party problem'. Here we show that for presentation of >2 call components, however, subjects are more likely to group the two components with the smallest relative differences in call parameters, including relative spatial separation (a primitive acoustic cue) and relative similarity to the species-specific call sequence (a schema-based cue). Thus, like humans, the cognitive rules for the perception of auditory groups amidst multiple sound sources include the use of relative comparisons, a flexible strategy for dynamic acoustic environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamilton E. Farris & Michael J. Ryan, 2011. "Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:2:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms1417
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms1417
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms1417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:2:y:2011:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms1417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.