Author
Listed:
- Hao Liu
(Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences)
- Jianjun Xu
(Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences)
- Xinyue Qi
(Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences)
- Xiao Xu
(Yunnan University, State Key Laboratory for Vegetation Structure, Functions and Construction (VegLab), Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Transboundary Ecosecurity of Southwest China, Institute of Biodiversity, School of Ecology and Environmental Science, and Southwest United Graduate School)
- Jihua Wu
(Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences
Lanzhou University, State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Ecology)
- Bo Li
(Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences
Yunnan University, State Key Laboratory for Vegetation Structure, Functions and Construction (VegLab), Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Transboundary Ecosecurity of Southwest China, Institute of Biodiversity, School of Ecology and Environmental Science, and Southwest United Graduate School)
- Ming Nie
(Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences)
Abstract
The functional trait diversity of plant communities regulates the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability. However, the role of functional trait diversity in explaining ecosystem productivity and stability in natural wetlands remains unclear. Using vegetation data from 1139 sites across U.S. wetlands, we examine the associations of functional diversity (trait dispersion within a community) and functional identity (community-level trait values) of plant size traits and resource economics traits with satellite-derived productivity and temporal stability at continental scales. Community-level plant size shows the strongest association with productivity and stability, which is consistent across different wetland types and levels of anthropogenic disturbance. While functional diversity is generally positively correlated with productivity and stability, these relationships vary substantially across environmental contexts. Notably, weaker correlations are observed under higher levels of anthropogenic disturbances. These findings suggest that wetland conservation and restoration efforts should focus on increasing functional diversity and prioritizing large dominant species to increase productivity and stability.
Suggested Citation
Hao Liu & Jianjun Xu & Xinyue Qi & Xiao Xu & Jihua Wu & Bo Li & Ming Nie, 2025.
"Wetland productivity and stability increase more with average plant size than with plant functional diversity,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-65822-9
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-65822-9
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-65822-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.