Author
Listed:
- Hon Wing Liu
(University of Lausanne (UNIL), Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM))
- Florian Roisné-Hamelin
(University of Lausanne (UNIL), Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM))
- Michael Taschner
(University of Lausanne (UNIL), Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM))
- James Collier
(University of Oxford, Department of Biochemistry
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology)
- Madhusudhan Srinivasan
(University of Oxford, Department of Biochemistry)
- Stephan Gruber
(University of Lausanne (UNIL), Department of Fundamental Microbiology (DMF), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM))
Abstract
DNA loop-extruding SMC complexes play vital roles in genome maintenance and DNA immunity. However, how these ring-shaped DNA motors navigate large DNA-bound obstacles has remained unclear. Here, we demonstrate that a bacterial SMC Wadjet complex can efficiently bypass obstacles larger than the SMC coiled coil lumen when they are tethered to the extruded DNA by a single-stranded DNA or RNA linker. This bypass is mediated by the selective entrapment of the linker within the SMC hinge channel, which functions as an obligate gate—permitting passage of the linker while retaining double-stranded DNA stably inside the SMC ring and keeping associated obstacles outside. We further show that eukaryotic SMC hinges similarly accommodate ssDNA, and that the hinge is dispensable for loop extrusion by Wadjet, altogether suggesting that obstacle bypass represents the conserved, long-sought function of the SMC hinge toroid. By integrating hinge bypass with loop extrusion, we provide a mechanistic framework for how DNA-entrapping SMC complexes can generate chromosomal loops densely decorated with obstacles.
Suggested Citation
Hon Wing Liu & Florian Roisné-Hamelin & Michael Taschner & James Collier & Madhusudhan Srinivasan & Stephan Gruber, 2025.
"The SMC Hinge is a Selective Gate for Obstacle Bypass,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-65408-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-65408-5
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-65408-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.