Author
Listed:
- Kaela Makins
(Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics
Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Irell and Manella Graduate School of Biological Sciences)
- Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre
(Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics
Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Irell and Manella Graduate School of Biological Sciences
Salk Institute for Biological Sciences)
- Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado
(Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics)
- Jeremy M. Stark
(Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics
Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Irell and Manella Graduate School of Biological Sciences)
Abstract
53BP1 accumulates at DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and is implicated in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but the genetic interplay of 53BP1 with the NHEJ pathway (e.g., DNA-PKcs) is poorly understood. We examine blunt DSB NHEJ of Cas9 DSBs, which is dependent on core NHEJ factors, and find that loss of 53BP1 does not affect such repair but causes a reduction when combined with DNA-PKcs disruption. In contrast, disrupting 53BP1 and DNA-PKcs, alone and together, has similar effects on the type of deletion mutation (increase in microhomology deletions). We find similar effects with RIF1, such that 53BP1-RIF1 appear to play a backup role for DNA-PKcs during blunt DSB NHEJ, but function in the same pathway to suppress microhomology deletions. Finally, DNA-PKcs kinase inhibition causes increased radiosensitivity and homology-directed repair that is not additive with loss of 53BP1. Altogether, 53BP1-RIF1 and DNA-PKcs show distinct genetic interactions with diverse DSB repair outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Kaela Makins & Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre & Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado & Jeremy M. Stark, 2025.
"53BP1-RIF1 and DNA-PKcs show distinct genetic interactions with diverse chromosomal break repair outcomes,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-65329-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-65329-3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-65329-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.