IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-64334-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted readout method for the evaluation of skin prick automated test results

Author

Listed:
  • Sven F. Seys

    (Hippo Dx)

  • Valérie Hox

    (Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc)

  • Adam M. Chaker

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Glynnis Greve

    (ZAS Sint-Augustinus)

  • Winde Lemmens

    (ZOL)

  • Anne-Lise Poirrier

    (CHU Liège)

  • Eline Beckers

    (ZOL)

  • Rembert Daems

    (Hippo Dx
    Ghent University)

  • Zuzana Diamant

    (KU Leuven
    Dept Clin Pharm & Pharmacol
    Department of Respiratory Medicine; Charles University and Thomayer Hospital)

  • Carmen Dierickx

    (ZOL)

  • Peter W. Hellings

    (KU Leuven
    UZ Leuven)

  • Caroline Huart

    (Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc)

  • Claudia Jerin

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Mark Jorissen

    (UZ Leuven
    KU Leuven)

  • Dirk Loeckx

    (Hippo Dx)

  • Hanne Oscé

    (ZAS Sint-Augustinus)

  • Karolien Roux

    (Dept Clin Pharm & Pharmacol)

  • Mark Thompson

    (Zurich University of Applied Sciences)

  • Sophie Tombu

    (CHU Liège)

  • Saartje Uyttebroek

    (UZ Leuven
    KU Leuven)

  • Andrzej Zarowski

    (ZAS Sint-Augustinus)

  • Senne Gorris

    (Hippo Dx
    AZ Herentals)

  • Laura Gerven

    (KU Leuven
    UZ Leuven
    KU Leuven)

Abstract

The skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for diagnosing allergic sensitization to aeroallergies. The Skin Prick Automated Test (SPAT) device has previously demonstrated reduced variability and more consistent test results compared to manual SPT. The current study aims to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) assisted readout method to support physicians in interpreting skin reactions following SPAT. To train the AI algorithm, 7812 wheals (651 patients) are manually labeled. To validate the AI measurement, the longest wheal diameter of 2604 wheals (217 patients) is measured by the treating physician and compared to the AI measurement. In addition, AI-assisted readout is validated on a separate test cohort of 95 patients (1140 wheals). We demonstrate that the AI measurements of the longest wheal diameter exhibit a strong correlation with the physician’s measurements. The AI algorithm shows a specificity of 98·4% and sensitivity of 85·0% in determining positive or negative test results in the validation cohort. In the test cohort, physicians adjust 5·8% of AI measurements, leading to a change in the test interpretation for only 0·5% of cases. AI-assisted readout significantly reduces inter- and intra-observer variability and readout time compared to manual physician measurements. Altogether, the AI-assisted readout method demonstrates high accuracy, with minimal misclassification of test results. Adding AI to SPAT further improves standardization across the SPT process, significantly reducing observer variability and time to readout.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven F. Seys & Valérie Hox & Adam M. Chaker & Glynnis Greve & Winde Lemmens & Anne-Lise Poirrier & Eline Beckers & Rembert Daems & Zuzana Diamant & Carmen Dierickx & Peter W. Hellings & Caroline Huart, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted readout method for the evaluation of skin prick automated test results," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-64334-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-64334-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64334-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-64334-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-64334-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.