Author
Listed:
- Zhongzhong Tu
(Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
- Heting Sun
(National Forestry and Grassland Administration)
- Tong Wang
(Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
- Yuhang Liu
(Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
- Yu Xu
(National Forestry and Grassland Administration)
- Peng Peng
(National Forestry and Grassland Administration)
- Siyuan Qin
(National Forestry and Grassland Administration)
- Changchun Tu
(Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Yangzhou University)
- Biao He
(Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
Abstract
Wild boars are considered pest animals in most of their distribution ranges, but their role as virus reservoirs has long been overlooked, with the circulation dynamics of their viruses rarely investigated. Here we prepared a data set, that is, BrCN-Virome, of 9281 viral metagenomes by pan-viromic analyses of 2535 organ and 274 blood samples from 466 healthy and 50 dead wild boars across 127 locations in 26 provincial regions of China. Compared to domestic pigs, BrCN-Virome shows different viromic composition, with a great expansion in the DNA virus diversity. Some wild boar viruses are traced to humans, domestic animals, wildlife, and arthropods, with several evidently or potentially related to epizootics or zoonoses. Pig pathogens spread widely in wild boars and are responsible for a substantial portion of wild boar mortality, with occurrences of co-infection with multiple African swine fever viruses. These results indicate that wild boars are a node animal connecting different animal taxa in the virus circulation network, and that their viruses not only pose a major threat to the pig industry but also challenge wildlife conservation and public health, highlighting the need for routine surveillance of wild boar viruses and active control of the wild boar population.
Suggested Citation
Zhongzhong Tu & Heting Sun & Tong Wang & Yuhang Liu & Yu Xu & Peng Peng & Siyuan Qin & Changchun Tu & Biao He, 2025.
"Node role of wild boars in virus circulation among wildlife and domestic animals,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-64019-4
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-64019-4
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-64019-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.