IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-63960-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inflammation and mutational burden differentially associated with nivolumab or ipilimumab combination efficacy in colorectal cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Lei

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Michael J. Overman

    (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Jin Yao

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Thierry André

    (Sorbonne Université)

  • Sara Lonardi

    (Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS)

  • Heinz-Josef Lenz

    (University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center)

  • Massimo Aglietta

    (IRCCS - Istituto di Candiolo)

  • Fabio Gelsomino

    (University Hospital of Modena)

  • Ray McDermott

    (St Vincent’s University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland)

  • Ka Yeung Mark Wong

    (Westmead Hospital)

  • Michael A. Morse

    (Duke University Medical Center)

  • Eric Van Cutsem

    (University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven and KU Leuven)

  • Alain Hendlisz

    (Institut Jules Bordet)

  • Dana B. Cardin

    (Vanderbilt University Medical Center)

  • Bart Neyns

    (Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel)

  • Andrew Hill

    (Tasman Oncology Research Ltd.)

  • Anuradha Krishnamurthy

    (University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
    Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center)

  • Franklin Chen

    (Novant Health Cancer Institute)

  • Samith Kochuparambil

    (Minnesota Oncology)

  • Robert R. Jenq

    (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Sandzhar Abdullaev

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Beilei He

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Ruslan Novosiadly

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Scott Kopetz

    (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

Abstract

Nivolumab alone and in combination with ipilimumab demonstrated durable clinical benefit in patients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer in the phase 2 CheckMate 142 study. Here, we report exploratory biomarker analyses from CheckMate 142 evaluating associations between various tissue biomarkers and the efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination in these patients. Higher expression of inflammation-related gene expression signatures is associated with improved response per investigator assessment and survival benefit with nivolumab monotherapy. In contrast, higher tumor mutational burden, tumor indel burden, and degrees of microsatellite instability are associated with improved response per investigator assessment and survival benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. While interpretation is limited by the exploratory nature of these analyses, they suggest that tumor antigenicity rather than baseline tumor inflammation might be important for the combinatorial efficacy. Validation of these findings in larger, randomized studies is necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Lei & Michael J. Overman & Jin Yao & Thierry André & Sara Lonardi & Heinz-Josef Lenz & Massimo Aglietta & Fabio Gelsomino & Ray McDermott & Ka Yeung Mark Wong & Michael A. Morse & Eric Van Cutsem, 2025. "Inflammation and mutational burden differentially associated with nivolumab or ipilimumab combination efficacy in colorectal cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63960-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63960-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63960-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-63960-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63960-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.