IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-63587-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending quantum-mechanical benchmark accuracy to biological ligand-pocket interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Mirela Puleva

    (University of Luxembourg
    University of Luxembourg, Campus Belval)

  • Leonardo Medrano Sandonas

    (University of Luxembourg
    TUD Dresden University of Technology)

  • Balázs D. Lőrincz

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics
    HUN-REN-BME Quantum Chemistry Research Group
    MTA-BME Lendület Quantum Chemistry Research Group)

  • Jorge Charry

    (University of Luxembourg
    Luxembourg Researchers Hub asbl)

  • David M. Rogers

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Péter R. Nagy

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics
    HUN-REN-BME Quantum Chemistry Research Group
    MTA-BME Lendület Quantum Chemistry Research Group)

  • Alexandre Tkatchenko

    (University of Luxembourg
    University of Luxembourg, Campus Belval)

Abstract

Predicting the binding affinity of ligands to protein pockets is key in the drug design pipeline. The flexibility of ligand-pocket motifs arises from a range of attractive and repulsive electronic interactions during binding. Accurately accounting for all interactions requires robust quantum-mechanical (QM) benchmarks, which are scarce for ligand-pocket systems. Additionally, disagreement between “gold standard” Coupled Cluster (CC) and Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods casts doubt on many benchmarks for larger non-covalent systems. We introduce the “QUantum Interacting Dimer” (QUID) benchmark framework containing 170 non-covalent (non-)equilibrium systems modeling chemically and structurally diverse ligand-pocket motifs. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory shows that QUID broadly covers non-covalent binding motifs and energetic contributions. Robust binding energies are obtained using complementary CC and QMC methods, achieving agreement of 0.5 kcal/mol. The benchmark data analysis reveals that several dispersion-inclusive density functional approximations provide accurate energy predictions, though their atomic van der Waals forces differ in magnitude and orientation. Contrarily, semiempirical methods and empirical force fields require improvements in capturing non-covalent interactions (NCIs) for out-of-equilibrium geometries. The wide span of NCIs, highly accurate interaction energies, and analysis of molecular properties take QUID beyond the “gold standard” for QM benchmarks of ligand-protein systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirela Puleva & Leonardo Medrano Sandonas & Balázs D. Lőrincz & Jorge Charry & David M. Rogers & Péter R. Nagy & Alexandre Tkatchenko, 2025. "Extending quantum-mechanical benchmark accuracy to biological ligand-pocket interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63587-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63587-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63587-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-63587-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63587-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.