Author
Listed:
- Jules M. Janssen Daalen
(Cognition and Behavior; Department of Neurology; Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders
Department of Physiology)
- Marjan J. Meinders
(Cognition and Behavior; Department of Neurology; Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders)
- Federica Giardina
(Biostatistics Group)
- Soania Mathur
(UnshakeableMD)
- Philip N. Ainslie
(School of Health and Exercise Sciences)
- Dick H. J. Thijssen
(Department of Physiology
Liverpool John Moores University)
- Bastiaan R. Bloem
(Cognition and Behavior; Department of Neurology; Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders)
Abstract
Preclinical evidence suggests positive symptomatic and neuroprotective effects of hypoxic conditioning in Parkinson’s disease (PD). This study (NCT05214287) investigated the safety, feasibility, short-term symptomatic and downstream effects of hypoxic conditioning in individuals with PD. 20 individuals with PD (mean age 62, 10 women, Hoehn-Yahr 1.5-3) completed randomized controlled double-blinded multiple N-of-1 trials. Each participant underwent five different 45-minute hypoxia interventions in duplicate: continuous hypoxia at FiO2 0.163 and 0.127, intermittent (five-minute intervals interspersed with normoxia) at FiO2 0.163 and 0.127, and placebo. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility as measured by adverse events, vital parameter disturbances, participant-rated discomfort and feasibility questionnaires. Secondary outcomes were short-term participant-rated and assessor-rated symptom scores. Exploratory indicators of target engagement were serum erythropoietin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light-chain (NfL), platelet-derived growth factor-receptor-β (PDGFRβ) and cortisol. Secondary outcomes were evaluated using frequentist and Bayesian analysis. 20 participants completed the protocol. The trial met its primary endpoints for safety and feasibility. 95 adverse events occurred, including one moderate and three serious events. Adverse events were not dose-dependent and occurred at comparable incidence following hypoxia and placebo. Hypoxic conditioning was well-tolerated. Low-FIO2 protocols caused significant oxygen desaturations in two participants. Participants considered longer-term application feasible. Intermittent hypoxia at FIO2 0.163 modestly improved most participant-rated symptoms for several hours compared to placebo, but not assessor-rated scales. One hour after intervention, serum markers did not differ between interventions. Hypoxic conditioning is safe and feasible in individuals with PD, and specific protocols may be associated with short-term symptom improvement. These findings inform and support follow-up studies of longer-term safety and efficacy of hypoxic conditioning.
Suggested Citation
Jules M. Janssen Daalen & Marjan J. Meinders & Federica Giardina & Soania Mathur & Philip N. Ainslie & Dick H. J. Thijssen & Bastiaan R. Bloem, 2025.
"Hypoxic conditioning in Parkinson’s disease: randomized controlled multiple N-of-1 trials,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63324-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63324-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63324-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.