IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-63071-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonreciprocal field theory for decision-making in multi-agent control systems

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Lama

    (Scuola Superiore Meridionale)

  • Mario di Bernardo

    (Scuola Superiore Meridionale
    University of Naples Federico II)

  • Sabine. H. L. Klapp

    (Technische Universität Berlin)

Abstract

Field theories for complex systems traditionally focus on collective behaviours emerging from simple, reciprocal pairwise interaction rules. However, many natural and artificial systems exhibit behaviours driven by microscopic decision-making processes that introduce both nonreciprocity and many-body interactions, challenging these conventional approaches. We develop a theoretical framework to incorporate decision-making into field theories using the shepherding problem from swarm robotics as a paradigmatic example of a multi-agent control system, where agents, the herders, must coordinate to confine another group of agents, the targets, within a prescribed region. By introducing continuous approximations of two key decision-making elements - target selection and trajectory planning - we derive field equations that capture the essential features of this distributed control problem. Our theory reveals that different decision-making strategies emerge at the continuum level, from average attraction to highly selective choices, and from undirected to goal-oriented motion, driving transitions between homogeneous and confined configurations. The resulting nonreciprocal field theory not only describes the shepherding problem but provides a general framework for incorporating decision-making into continuum theories of collective behaviour, with implications for applications ranging from robotic swarms to traffic and crowd management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Lama & Mario di Bernardo & Sabine. H. L. Klapp, 2025. "Nonreciprocal field theory for decision-making in multi-agent control systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63071-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63071-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63071-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-63071-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Fruchart & Ryo Hanai & Peter B. Littlewood & Vincenzo Vitelli, 2021. "Non-reciprocal phase transitions," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7854), pages 363-369, April.
    2. Ruben Zakine & Jerome Garnier-Brun & Antoine-Cyrus Becharat & Michael Benzaquen, 2023. "Socioeconomic agents as active matter in nonequilibrium Sakoda-Schelling models," Papers 2307.14270, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    3. Yang-Yu Liu & Jean-Jacques Slotine & Albert-László Barabási, 2011. "Controllability of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7346), pages 167-173, May.
    4. Utsab Khadka & Viktor Holubec & Haw Yang & Frank Cichos, 2018. "Active particles bound by information flows," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Alberto Dinelli & Jérémy O’Byrne & Agnese Curatolo & Yongfeng Zhao & Peter Sollich & Julien Tailleur, 2023. "Non-reciprocity across scales in active mixtures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suropriya Saha & Ramin Golestanian, 2025. "Effervescence in a binary mixture with nonlinear non-reciprocal interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Xiangzun Wang & Pin-Chuan Chen & Klaus Kroy & Viktor Holubec & Frank Cichos, 2023. "Spontaneous vortex formation by microswimmers with retarded attractions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Ryo Hanai & Daiki Ootsuki & Rina Tazai, 2025. "Photoinduced non-reciprocal magnetism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. James Mason & Robert L. Jack & Maria Bruna, 2025. "Dynamical patterns and nonreciprocal effective interactions in an active-passive mixture through exact hydrodynamic analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Maxime Hubert & Stéphane Perrard & Nicolas Vandewalle & Matthieu Labousse, 2022. "Overload wave-memory induces amnesia of a self-propelled particle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Andreas Koulouris & Ioannis Katerelos & Theodore Tsekeris, 2013. "Multi-Equilibria Regulation Agent-Based Model of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 11(1), pages 51-70.
    7. He, He & Yang, Bo & Hu, Xiaoming, 2016. "Exploring community structure in networks by consensus dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 342-353.
    8. Ellinas, Christos & Allan, Neil & Johansson, Anders, 2016. "Project systemic risk: Application examples of a network model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 50-62.
    9. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    10. Ma, Weiyuan & Bao, Xionggai & Ma, Chenjun, 2024. "Controllability of higher-order networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 653(C).
    11. Meng, Tao & Duan, Gaopeng & Li, Aming & Wang, Long, 2023. "Control energy scaling for target control of complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Yin, Haofei & Cui, Xiaohua & Zeng, An, 2024. "An innovative defense strategy against targeted spreading in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 654(C).
    13. Tao Jia & Robert F Spivey & Boleslaw Szymanski & Gyorgy Korniss, 2015. "An Analysis of the Matching Hypothesis in Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Yang, Xu-Hua & Lou, Shun-Li & Chen, Guang & Chen, Sheng-Yong & Huang, Wei, 2013. "Scale-free networks via attaching to random neighbors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3531-3536.
    15. Zhang, Rui & Wang, Xiaomeng & Cheng, Ming & Jia, Tao, 2019. "The evolution of network controllability in growing networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 520(C), pages 257-266.
    16. Wouter Vermeer & Otto Koppius & Peter Vervest, 2018. "The Radiation-Transmission-Reception (RTR) model of propagation: Implications for the effectiveness of network interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Chen, Shi-Ming & Xu, Yun-Fei & Nie, Sen, 2017. "Robustness of network controllability in cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 536-539.
    18. Xizhe Zhang & Huaizhen Wang & Tianyang Lv, 2017. "Efficient target control of complex networks based on preferential matching," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, April.
    19. Pang, Shao-Peng & Hao, Fei, 2018. "Effect of interaction strength on robustness of controlling edge dynamics in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 497(C), pages 246-257.
    20. Xian Xi & Xiangyun Gao & Xiaotian Sun & Huiling Zheng & Congcong Wu, 2024. "Dynamic analysis and application of network structure control in risk conduction in the industrial chain," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63071-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.