IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-61692-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Higher resolution pooled genome-wide CRISPR knockout screening in Drosophila cells using integration and anti-CRISPR (IntAC)

Author

Listed:
  • Raghuvir Viswanatha

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Samuel Entwisle

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Yanhui Hu

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Ah-Ram Kim

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Kelly Reap

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Matthew Butnaru

    (Harvard Medical School
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

  • Mujeeb Qadiri

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Stephanie E. Mohr

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Norbert Perrimon

    (Harvard Medical School
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

Abstract

CRISPR screens enable systematic, scalable genotype-to-phenotype mapping. We previously developed a CRISPR screening method for Drosophila melanogaster and mosquito cell lines using plasmid transfection and site-specific integration to introduce single guide (sgRNA) libraries. The method relies on weak sgRNA promoters to avoid early CRISPR-Cas9 activity causing discrepancies between genome edits and integrated sgRNAs. To address this issue and utilize higher strength sgRNA expression, we introduce a method to co-transfect a plasmid expressing anti-CRISPR protein to suppress early CRISPR-Cas9 activity which we term “IntAC” (integrase with anti-CRISPR). IntAC dramatically improves precision-recall of fitness genes across the genome, allowing us to generate the most comprehensive list of cell fitness genes yet assembled for Drosophila. Drosophila fitness genes show strong correlation with human fitness genes and underscore the effects of paralogs on gene essentiality. We also perform a resistance screen to proaerolysin, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-(GPI)-binding pore-forming toxin, retrieving 18/23 expected and one previously uncharacterized GPI synthesis gene. We also demonstrate that an IntAC sublibrary enables precise positive selection of a transporter under solute overload. IntAC represents a straightforward enhancement to existing Drosophila CRISPR screening methods, dramatically increasing accuracy, and might also be broadly applicable to virus-free CRISPR screens in other cell and species types.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghuvir Viswanatha & Samuel Entwisle & Yanhui Hu & Ah-Ram Kim & Kelly Reap & Matthew Butnaru & Mujeeb Qadiri & Stephanie E. Mohr & Norbert Perrimon, 2025. "Higher resolution pooled genome-wide CRISPR knockout screening in Drosophila cells using integration and anti-CRISPR (IntAC)," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61692-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61692-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61692-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-61692-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Dong & Minghui Guo & Sihan Wang & Yuwei Zhu & Shuo Wang & Zhi Xiong & Jianzheng Yang & Zengliang Xu & Zhiwei Huang, 2017. "Structural basis of CRISPR–SpyCas9 inhibition by an anti-CRISPR protein," Nature, Nature, vol. 546(7658), pages 436-439, June.
    2. Peter C. DeWeirdt & Abby V. McGee & Fengyi Zheng & Ifunanya Nwolah & Mudra Hegde & John G. Doench, 2022. "Accounting for small variations in the tracrRNA sequence improves sgRNA activity predictions for CRISPR screening," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Raghuvir Viswanatha & Enzo Mameli & Jonathan Rodiger & Pierre Merckaert & Fabiana Feitosa-Suntheimer & Tonya M. Colpitts & Stephanie E. Mohr & Yanhui Hu & Norbert Perrimon, 2021. "Bioinformatic and cell-based tools for pooled CRISPR knockout screening in mosquitos," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Ying Xu & Raghuvir Viswanatha & Oleg Sitsel & Daniel Roderer & Haifang Zhao & Christopher Ashwood & Cecilia Voelcker & Songhai Tian & Stefan Raunser & Norbert Perrimon & Min Dong, 2022. "CRISPR screens in Drosophila cells identify Vsg as a Tc toxin receptor," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7931), pages 349-355, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan Riesenberg & Philipp Kanis & Rosa Karlic & Tomislav Maricic, 2025. "Robust prediction of synthetic gRNA activity and cryptic DNA repair by disentangling cellular CRISPR cleavage outcomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Yanan Zhao & Jiaojiao Hu & Shan-Shan Yang & Jing Zhong & Jianping Liu & Shuo Wang & Yuzhuo Jiao & Fang Jiang & Ruiyang Zhai & Bingnan Ren & Hua Cong & Yuwei Zhu & Fengtong Han & Jixian Zhang & Yue Xu , 2022. "A redox switch regulates the assembly and anti-CRISPR activity of AcrIIC1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Min Zhang & Xue Zhang & Yongyue Xu & Yanhui Xiang & Bo Zhang & Zhen Xie & Qiong Wu & Chunbo Lou, 2024. "High-resolution and programmable RNA-IN and RNA-OUT genetic circuit in living mammalian cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Xieshuting Deng & Wei Sun & Xueyan Li & Jiuyu Wang & Zhi Cheng & Gang Sheng & Yanli Wang, 2024. "An anti-CRISPR that represses its own transcription while blocking Cas9-target DNA binding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Luke Hoberecht & Pirunthan Perampalam & Aaron Lun & Jean-Philippe Fortin, 2022. "A comprehensive Bioconductor ecosystem for the design of CRISPR guide RNAs across nucleases and technologies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61692-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.