IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-61458-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational models reveal that intuitive physics underlies visual processing of soft objects

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyan Bi

    (Yale University)

  • Aalap D. Shah

    (Yale University)

  • Kimberly W. Wong

    (Yale University)

  • Brian J. Scholl

    (Yale University
    Yale University)

  • Ilker Yildirim

    (Yale University
    Yale University
    Yale University
    Yale University)

Abstract

Computational explorations of human cognition have been especially successful when applied to visual perception. Existing models have primarily focused on rigid objects, emphasizing shape-preserving invariance to changes in viewpoint, lighting, object size, and scene context. Yet many objects in our everyday environments, such as cloths, are soft. This poses both quantitatively greater and qualitatively different challenges for models of perception, due to soft objects’ dynamic and high-dimensional internal structure, as in the changing folds and wrinkles of a cloth waving in the wind. Soft object perception is also correspondingly rich, involving distinct properties such as stiffness. Here we explore the ability of different kinds of computational models to capture visual perception of the physical properties of cloths (e.g., their degrees of stiffness) undergoing different naturalistic transformations (e.g., falling vs. waving in the wind). Across visual matching tasks, both the successes and failures of human performance are well explained by Woven: a new model that incorporates physics-based simulations to infer probabilistic representations of cloths. Woven outperforms powerful, performance-equated alternatives, including its ablations and a deep neural network, and suggests that humanlike machine vision may also require representations that transcend image statistics, and involve intuitive physics.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyan Bi & Aalap D. Shah & Kimberly W. Wong & Brian J. Scholl & Ilker Yildirim, 2025. "Computational models reveal that intuitive physics underlies visual processing of soft objects," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61458-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61458-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61458-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-61458-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis S. Piloto & Ari Weinstein & Peter Battaglia & Matthew Botvinick, 2022. "Intuitive physics learning in a deep-learning model inspired by developmental psychology," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 1257-1267, September.
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:1007210 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Chenxi Liao & Masataka Sawayama & Bei Xiao, 2023. "Unsupervised learning reveals interpretable latent representations for translucency perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-31, February.
    4. Katherine R. Storrs & Barton L. Anderson & Roland W. Fleming, 2021. "Unsupervised learning predicts human perception and misperception of gloss," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 1402-1417, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra C. Schmid & Pascal Barla & Katja Doerschner, 2023. "Material category of visual objects computed from specular image structure," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1152-1169, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61458-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.