IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-59779-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive evaluation of phosphoproteomic-based kinase activity inference

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Müller-Dott

    (Institute for Computational Biomedicine)

  • Eric J. Jaehnig

    (Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Khoi Pham Munchic

    (The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Wen Jiang

    (Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Tomer M. Yaron-Barir

    (Weill Cornell Medicine
    Weill Cornell Medicine
    Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons)

  • Sara R. Savage

    (Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Martin Garrido-Rodriguez

    (Institute for Computational Biomedicine
    European Molecular Biology Laboratory)

  • Jared L. Johnson

    (Harvard Medical School
    Harvard Medical School)

  • Alessandro Lussana

    (European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI))

  • Evangelia Petsalaki

    (European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI))

  • Jonathan T. Lei

    (Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Aurelien Dugourd

    (Institute for Computational Biomedicine)

  • Karsten Krug

    (The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Lewis C. Cantley

    (Harvard Medical School
    Harvard Medical School)

  • D. R. Mani

    (The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

  • Bing Zhang

    (Baylor College of Medicine
    Baylor College of Medicine)

  • Julio Saez-Rodriguez

    (Institute for Computational Biomedicine
    European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI))

Abstract

Kinases regulate cellular processes and are essential for understanding cellular function and disease. To investigate the regulatory state of a kinase, numerous methods have been developed to infer kinase activities from phosphoproteomics data using kinase-substrate libraries. However, few phosphorylation sites can be attributed to an upstream kinase in these libraries, limiting the scope of kinase activity inference. Moreover, inferred activities vary across methods, necessitating evaluation for accurate interpretation. Here, we present benchmarKIN, an R package enabling comprehensive evaluation of kinase activity inference methods. Alongside classical perturbation experiments, benchmarKIN introduces a tumor-based benchmarking approach utilizing multi-omics data to identify highly active or inactive kinases. We used benchmarKIN to evaluate kinase-substrate libraries, inference algorithms and the potential of adding predicted kinase-substrate interactions to overcome the coverage limitations. Our evaluation shows most computational methods perform similarly, but the choice of library impacts the inferred activities with a combination of manually curated libraries demonstrating superior performance in recapitulating kinase activities. Additionally, in the tumor-based evaluation, adding predicted targets from NetworKIN further boosts the performance. We then demonstrate how kinase activity inference aids characterize kinase inhibitor responses in cell lines. Overall, benchmarKIN helps researchers to select reliable methods for identifying deregulated kinases.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Müller-Dott & Eric J. Jaehnig & Khoi Pham Munchic & Wen Jiang & Tomer M. Yaron-Barir & Sara R. Savage & Martin Garrido-Rodriguez & Jared L. Johnson & Alessandro Lussana & Evangelia Petsalaki & , 2025. "Comprehensive evaluation of phosphoproteomic-based kinase activity inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-59779-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59779-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59779-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-59779-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-59779-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.