IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-37084-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical outcome and biomarker assessments of a multi-centre phase II trial assessing niraparib with or without dostarlimab in recurrent endometrial carcinoma

Author

Listed:
  • Ainhoa Madariaga

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto
    Autonomous University of Barcelona
    12 de Octubre University Hospital)

  • Swati Garg

    (University Health Network)

  • Nairi Tchrakian

    (University of Toronto
    University Health Network)

  • Neesha C. Dhani

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Waldo Jimenez

    (Juravinski Cancer Centre)

  • Stephen Welch

    (London Regional Cancer Program)

  • Helen MacKay

    (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre)

  • Josee-Lyne Ethier

    (Kingston Health Sciences Cancer Centre)

  • Lucy Gilbert

    (McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital)

  • Xuan Li

    (University Health Network)

  • Angela Rodriguez

    (University Health Network)

  • Lucy Chan

    (University Health Network)

  • Valerie Bowering

    (University Health Network)

  • Blaise Clarke

    (University of Toronto
    University Health Network)

  • Tong Zhang

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Ian King

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Gregory Downs

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Tracy Stockley

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Lisa Wang

    (University of Toronto
    University Health Network)

  • Smitha Udagani

    (University Health Network)

  • Amit M. Oza

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

  • Stephanie Lheureux

    (University Health Network
    University of Toronto)

Abstract

This multi-centre, non-randomized, open-label, phase II trial (NCT03016338), assessed niraparib monotherapy (cohort 1, C1), or niraparib and dostarlimab (cohort 2, C2) in patients with recurrent serous or endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), with ≥5/22 overall considered of interest. Secondary outcomes were safety, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival. Translational research was an exploratory outcome. Potential biomarkers were evaluated in archival tissue by immunohistochemistry and next generation sequencing panel. In C1, 25 patients were enrolled, and CBR was 20% (95% CI: 9–39) with median clinical benefit duration of 5.3 months. The ORR was 4% (95% CI: 0–20). In C2, 22 patients were enrolled, and the CBR was 31.8% (95% CI: 16–53) with median clinical benefit duration of 6.8 months. The ORR was 14% (95% CI: 3–35). No new safety signals were detected. No significant association was detected between clinical benefit and IHC markers (PTEN, p53, MMR, PD-L1), or molecular profiling (PTEN, TP53, homologous recombination repair genes). In conclusion, niraparib monotherapy did not meet the efficacy threshold. Niraparib in combination with dostarlimab showed modest activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ainhoa Madariaga & Swati Garg & Nairi Tchrakian & Neesha C. Dhani & Waldo Jimenez & Stephen Welch & Helen MacKay & Josee-Lyne Ethier & Lucy Gilbert & Xuan Li & Angela Rodriguez & Lucy Chan & Valerie B, 2023. "Clinical outcome and biomarker assessments of a multi-centre phase II trial assessing niraparib with or without dostarlimab in recurrent endometrial carcinoma," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-37084-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37084-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37084-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-37084-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-37084-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.