IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26906-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding positive meaning in memories of negative events adaptively updates memory

Author

Listed:
  • Megan E. Speer

    (Columbia University)

  • Sandra Ibrahim

    (Rutgers University)

  • Daniela Schiller

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Mauricio R. Delgado

    (Rutgers University)

Abstract

Finding positive meaning in past negative memories is associated with enhanced mental health. Yet it remains unclear whether it leads to updates in the memory representation itself. Since memory can be labile after retrieval, this leaves the potential for modification whenever its reactivated. Across four experiments, we show that positively reinterpreting negative memories adaptively updates them, leading to the re-emergence of positivity at future retrieval. Focusing on the positive aspects after negative recall leads to enhanced positive emotion and changes in memory content during recollection one week later, remaining even after two months. Consistent with a reactivation-induced reconsolidation account, memory updating occurs only after a reminder and twenty four hours, but not a one hour delay. Multi-session fMRI showed adaptive updates are reflected in greater hippocampal and ventral striatal pattern dissimilarity across retrievals. This research highlights the mechanisms by which updating of maladaptive memories occurs through a positive emotion-focused strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan E. Speer & Sandra Ibrahim & Daniela Schiller & Mauricio R. Delgado, 2021. "Finding positive meaning in memories of negative events adaptively updates memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26906-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26906-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26906-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26906-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew P. Walker & Tiffany Brakefield & J. Allan Hobson & Robert Stickgold, 2003. "Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6958), pages 616-620, October.
    2. Daniela Schiller & Marie-H. Monfils & Candace M. Raio & David C. Johnson & Joseph E. LeDoux & Elizabeth A. Phelps, 2010. "Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7277), pages 49-53, January.
    3. Karim Nader & Glenn E. Schafe & Joseph E. Le Doux, 2000. "Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6797), pages 722-726, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barili, Emilia & Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica & Rattini, Veronica, 2024. "COVID angels fighting daily demons? Mental well-being of healthcare workers and religiosity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ella Gabitov & Arnaud Boutin & Basile Pinsard & Nitzan Censor & Stuart M Fogel & Geneviève Albouy & Bradley R King & Julie Carrier & Leonardo G Cohen & Avi Karni & Julien Doyon, 2019. "Susceptibility of consolidated procedural memory to interference is independent of its active task-based retrieval," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Yoav Kessler & Susan Vandermorris & Nigel Gopie & Alexander Daros & Gordon Winocur & Morris Moscovitch, 2014. "Divided Attention Improves Delayed, but Not Immediate Retrieval of a Consolidated Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    3. Cecilia Forcato & María L C Rodríguez & María E Pedreira, 2011. "Repeated Labilization-Reconsolidation Processes Strengthen Declarative Memory in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Laura Arnemann & Kai A Konrad & Niklas Potrafke, 2021. "Collective memories on the 2010 European debt crisis," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(4), pages 762-784, December.
    5. Sho K Sugawara & Satoshi Tanaka & Shuntaro Okazaki & Katsumi Watanabe & Norihiro Sadato, 2012. "Social Rewards Enhance Offline Improvements in Motor Skill," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-6, November.
    6. Mouna Maroun & Alexandra Kavushansky & Andrew Holmes & Cara Wellman & Helen Motanis, 2012. "Enhanced Extinction of Aversive Memories by High-Frequency Stimulation of the Rat Infralimbic Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-8, May.
    7. Denis Ertelt & Karsten Witt & Kathrin Reetz & Wolfgang Frank & Klaus Junghanns & Jutta Backhaus & Vera Tadic & Antonello Pellicano & Jan Born & Ferdinand Binkofski, 2012. "Skill Memory Escaping from Distraction by Sleep—Evidence from Dual-Task Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Benedikt Lauber & Jesper Lundbye-Jensen & Martin Keller & Albert Gollhofer & Wolfgang Taube & Christian Leukel, 2013. "Cross-Limb Interference during Motor Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Dimitri Nowicki & Hava Siegelmann, 2010. "Flexible Kernel Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Cecilia Forcato & Luz Bavassi & Gabriela De Pino & Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández & Mirta Fabiana Villarreal & María Eugenia Pedreira, 2016. "Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Bhavin R Sheth & Davit Janvelyan & Murtuza Khan, 2008. "Practice Makes Imperfect: Restorative Effects of Sleep on Motor Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-9, September.
    12. Rany Abend & Avi Karni & Avi Sadeh & Nathan A Fox & Daniel S Pine & Yair Bar-Haim, 2013. "Learning to Attend to Threat Accelerates and Enhances Memory Consolidation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Roberta Patalano, 2007. "Mind-dependence. The past in the grip of the present," Discussion Papers 1_2007, D.E.S. (Department of Economic Studies), University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    14. Tamir Eisenstein & Edna Furman-Haran & Assaf Tal, 2024. "Early excitatory-inhibitory cortical modifications following skill learning are associated with motor memory consolidation and plasticity overnight," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Johannes Holz & Hannah Piosczyk & Nina Landmann & Bernd Feige & Kai Spiegelhalder & Dieter Riemann & Christoph Nissen & Ulrich Voderholzer, 2012. "The Timing of Learning before Night-Time Sleep Differentially Affects Declarative and Procedural Long-Term Memory Consolidation in Adolescents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
    16. Roberta Patalano, 2007. "Mind-Dependence. The Past in the Grip of the Present," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 85-107, August.
    17. Cecilia Forcato & Rodrigo S Fernandez & María E Pedreira, 2013. "The Role and Dynamic of Strengthening in the Reconsolidation Process in a Human Declarative Memory: What Decides the Fate of Recent and Older Memories?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    18. Simon P Orozco & Scott T Albert & Reza Shadmehr, 2021. "Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-30, July.
    19. Kristoffer C Aberg & Michael H Herzog, 2010. "Does Perceptual Learning Suffer from Retrograde Interference?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-6, December.
    20. Amy L Cochran & Josh M Cisler, 2019. "A flexible and generalizable model of online latent-state learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26906-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.