IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26023-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams

Author

Listed:
  • Yiqiu Shen

    (New York University)

  • Farah E. Shamout

    (NYU Abu Dhabi)

  • Jamie R. Oliver

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Jan Witowski

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Kawshik Kannan

    (Courant Institute, New York University)

  • Jungkyu Park

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Nan Wu

    (New York University)

  • Connor Huddleston

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Stacey Wolfson

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Alexandra Millet

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Robin Ehrenpreis

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Divya Awal

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Cathy Tyma

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Naziya Samreen

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Yiming Gao

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Chloe Chhor

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Stacey Gandhi

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Cindy Lee

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Sheila Kumari-Subaiya

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Cindy Leonard

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Reyhan Mohammed

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Christopher Moczulski

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Jaime Altabet

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • James Babb

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Alana Lewin

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Beatriu Reig

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Linda Moy

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine
    NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Laura Heacock

    (NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

  • Krzysztof J. Geras

    (New York University
    NYU Grossman School of Medicine
    NYU Grossman School of Medicine)

Abstract

Though consistently shown to detect mammographically occult cancers, breast ultrasound has been noted to have high false-positive rates. In this work, we present an AI system that achieves radiologist-level accuracy in identifying breast cancer in ultrasound images. Developed on 288,767 exams, consisting of 5,442,907 B-mode and Color Doppler images, the AI achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.976 on a test set consisting of 44,755 exams. In a retrospective reader study, the AI achieves a higher AUROC than the average of ten board-certified breast radiologists (AUROC: 0.962 AI, 0.924 ± 0.02 radiologists). With the help of the AI, radiologists decrease their false positive rates by 37.3% and reduce requested biopsies by 27.8%, while maintaining the same level of sensitivity. This highlights the potential of AI in improving the accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of breast ultrasound diagnosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiqiu Shen & Farah E. Shamout & Jamie R. Oliver & Jan Witowski & Kawshik Kannan & Jungkyu Park & Nan Wu & Connor Huddleston & Stacey Wolfson & Alexandra Millet & Robin Ehrenpreis & Divya Awal & Cathy , 2021. "Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26023-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26023-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26023-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26023-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26023-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.