Author
Listed:
- Xuhui Wang
(Peking University)
- Christoph Müller
(Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)
- Joshua Elliot
(University of Chicago and ANL Computation Institute
Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research)
- Nathaniel D. Mueller
(Colorado State University
Colorado State University)
- Philippe Ciais
(Peking University
CEA CNRS UVSQ Orme des Merisiers)
- Jonas Jägermeyr
(University of Chicago and ANL Computation Institute
Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research)
- James Gerber
(University of Minnesota)
- Patrice Dumas
(Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement)
- Chenzhi Wang
(Peking University)
- Hui Yang
(Peking University
CEA CNRS UVSQ Orme des Merisiers)
- Laurent Li
(Université Pierre et Marie Curie)
- Delphine Deryng
(Climate Analytics)
- Christian Folberth
(Ludwig Maximilian University)
- Wenfeng Liu
(China Agricultural University)
- David Makowski
(Université Paris-Saclay, UMR 211 Agronomie)
- Stefan Olin
(Lund University)
- Thomas A. M. Pugh
(Lund University)
- Ashwan Reddy
(University of Maryland)
- Erwin Schmid
(University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences)
- Sujong Jeong
(Seoul National University)
- Feng Zhou
(Peking University)
- Shilong Piao
(Peking University
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract
Irrigation is the largest sector of human water use and an important option for increasing crop production and reducing drought impacts. However, the potential for irrigation to contribute to global crop yields remains uncertain. Here, we quantify this contribution for wheat and maize at global scale by developing a Bayesian framework integrating empirical estimates and gridded global crop models on new maps of the relative difference between attainable rainfed and irrigated yield (ΔY). At global scale, ΔY is 34 ± 9% for wheat and 22 ± 13% for maize, with large spatial differences driven more by patterns of precipitation than that of evaporative demand. Comparing irrigation demands with renewable water supply, we find 30–47% of contemporary rainfed agriculture of wheat and maize cannot achieve yield gap closure utilizing current river discharge, unless more water diversion projects are set in place, putting into question the potential of irrigation to mitigate climate change impacts.
Suggested Citation
Xuhui Wang & Christoph Müller & Joshua Elliot & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Philippe Ciais & Jonas Jägermeyr & James Gerber & Patrice Dumas & Chenzhi Wang & Hui Yang & Laurent Li & Delphine Deryng & Christ, 2021.
"Global irrigation contribution to wheat and maize yield,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21498-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21498-5
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21498-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.