Author
Listed:
- Anita Mitra
(Imperial College
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust)
- David A. MacIntyre
(Imperial College
Imperial College London)
- George Ntritsos
(University of Ioannina School of Medicine)
- Ann Smith
(Cardiff University)
- Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
(University of Ioannina School of Medicine
Imperial College London)
- Julian R. Marchesi
(Imperial College London
Cardiff University
Imperial College London)
- Phillip R. Bennett
(Imperial College
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Imperial College London)
- Anna-Barbara Moscicki
(UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital)
- Maria Kyrgiou
(Imperial College
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust)
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests associations between the vaginal microbiota (VMB) composition, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); however, causal inference remains uncertain. Here, we use bacterial DNA sequencing from serially collected vaginal samples from a cohort of 87 adolescent and young women aged 16–26 years with histologically confirmed, untreated CIN2 lesions to determine whether VMB composition affects rates of regression over 24 months. We show that women with a Lactobacillus-dominant microbiome at baseline are more likely to have regressive disease at 12 months. Lactobacillus spp. depletion and presence of specific anaerobic taxa including Megasphaera, Prevotella timonensis and Gardnerella vaginalis are associated with CIN2 persistence and slower regression. These findings suggest that VMB composition may be a future useful biomarker in predicting disease outcome and tailoring surveillance, whilst it may offer rational targets for the development of new prevention and treatment strategies.
Suggested Citation
Anita Mitra & David A. MacIntyre & George Ntritsos & Ann Smith & Konstantinos K. Tsilidis & Julian R. Marchesi & Phillip R. Bennett & Anna-Barbara Moscicki & Maria Kyrgiou, 2020.
"The vaginal microbiota associates with the regression of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 lesions,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-15856-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15856-y
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-15856-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.