IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v10y2019i1d10.1038_s41467-018-08158-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-CRISPR-mediated control of gene editing and synthetic circuits in eukaryotic cells

Author

Listed:
  • Muneaki Nakamura

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Prashanth Srinivasan

    (Stanford University)

  • Michael Chavez

    (Stanford University)

  • Matthew A. Carter

    (Stanford University)

  • Antonia A. Dominguez

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Marie La Russa

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Matthew B. Lau

    (Stanford University
    International Christian School)

  • Timothy R. Abbott

    (Stanford University)

  • Xiaoshu Xu

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Dehua Zhao

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Yuchen Gao

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Nathan H. Kipniss

    (Stanford University)

  • Christina D. Smolke

    (Stanford University)

  • Joseph Bondy-Denomy

    (University of California
    University of California)

  • Lei S. Qi

    (Stanford University
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

Abstract

Repurposed CRISPR-Cas molecules provide a useful tool set for broad applications of genomic editing and regulation of gene expression in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Recent discovery of phage-derived proteins, anti-CRISPRs, which serve to abrogate natural CRISPR anti-phage activity, potentially expands the ability to build synthetic CRISPR-mediated circuits. Here, we characterize a panel of anti-CRISPR molecules for expanded applications to counteract CRISPR-mediated gene activation and repression of reporter and endogenous genes in various cell types. We demonstrate that cells pre-engineered with anti-CRISPR molecules become resistant to gene editing, thus providing a means to generate “write-protected” cells that prevent future gene editing. We further show that anti-CRISPRs can be used to control CRISPR-based gene regulation circuits, including implementation of a pulse generator circuit in mammalian cells. Our work suggests that anti-CRISPR proteins should serve as widely applicable tools for synthetic systems regulating the behavior of eukaryotic cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Muneaki Nakamura & Prashanth Srinivasan & Michael Chavez & Matthew A. Carter & Antonia A. Dominguez & Marie La Russa & Matthew B. Lau & Timothy R. Abbott & Xiaoshu Xu & Dehua Zhao & Yuchen Gao & Natha, 2019. "Anti-CRISPR-mediated control of gene editing and synthetic circuits in eukaryotic cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-08158-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08158-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08158-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-018-08158-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanan Zhao & Jiaojiao Hu & Shan-Shan Yang & Jing Zhong & Jianping Liu & Shuo Wang & Yuzhuo Jiao & Fang Jiang & Ruiyang Zhai & Bingnan Ren & Hua Cong & Yuwei Zhu & Fengtong Han & Jixian Zhang & Yue Xu , 2022. "A redox switch regulates the assembly and anti-CRISPR activity of AcrIIC1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Yafeng Wang & Guiquan Zhang & Qingzhou Meng & Shisheng Huang & Panpan Guo & Qibin Leng & Lingyun Sun & Geng Liu & Xingxu Huang & Jianghuai Liu, 2022. "Precise tumor immune rewiring via synthetic CRISPRa circuits gated by concurrent gain/loss of transcription factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-08158-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.