IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v4y2014i5d10.1038_nclimate2187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biofuels from crop residue can reduce soil carbon and increase CO2 emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Adam J. Liska

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln
    University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Haishun Yang

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Maribeth Milner

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Steve Goddard

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Humberto Blanco-Canqui

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Matthew P. Pelton

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Xiao X. Fang

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Haitao Zhu

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Andrew E. Suyker

    (School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

Abstract

Life-cycle assessment of biofuel carbon emissions does not usually take into account the potential for soil carbon loss resulting from crop residue removal. Now estimates of CO2 emissions due to corn residue removal across the US Corn Belt indicate that the emissions from soil carbon loss could push total emissions above the US legislative mandate.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam J. Liska & Haishun Yang & Maribeth Milner & Steve Goddard & Humberto Blanco-Canqui & Matthew P. Pelton & Xiao X. Fang & Haitao Zhu & Andrew E. Suyker, 2014. "Biofuels from crop residue can reduce soil carbon and increase CO2 emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 398-401, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:4:y:2014:i:5:d:10.1038_nclimate2187
    DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2187
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nclimate2187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qin, Zhangcai & Zhuang, Qianlai & Cai, Ximing & He, Yujie & Huang, Yao & Jiang, Dong & Lin, Erda & Liu, Yaling & Tang, Ya & Wang, Michael Q., 2018. "Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2387-2400.
    2. Koponen, Kati & Soimakallio, Sampo & Kline, Keith L. & Cowie, Annette & Brandão, Miguel, 2018. "Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy – Choice of reference system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2271-2280.
    3. Pinyi Su & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Nadeem & Shamsheer ul Haq, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Law in Farmers’ Environment-Protecting Intentions and Behavior Based on Their Legal Cognition: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Weng, Yuwei & Chang, Shiyan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2019. "Exploring the impacts of biofuel expansion on land use change and food security based on a land explicit CGE model: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 514-525.
    5. Maggie R. Davis & Bruno J. R. Alves & Douglas L. Karlen & Keith L. Kline & Marcelo Galdos & Dana Abulebdeh, 2017. "Review of Soil Organic Carbon Measurement Protocols: A US and Brazil Comparison and Recommendation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. V. Venkatramanan & Shachi Shah & Shiv Prasad & Anoop Singh & Ram Prasad, 2021. "Assessment of Bioenergy Generation Potential of Agricultural Crop Residues in India," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    7. Searchinger, Timothy D. & Beringer, Tim & Strong, Asa, 2017. "Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 434-446.
    8. Mads Greaker & Michael Hoel & Knut Einar Rosendahl, 2014. "Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(3), pages 337-363.
    9. Karlsson, Hanna & Ahlgren, Serina & Strid, Ingrid & Hansson, Per-Anders, 2015. "Faba beans for biorefinery feedstock or feed? Greenhouse gas and energy balances of different applications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 138-148.
    10. Ruiqing Miao & Madhu Khanna, 2017. "Effectiveness of the Biomass Crop Assistance Program: Roles of Behavioral Factors, Credit Constraint, and Program Design," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(4), pages 584-608.
    11. Monforti, F. & Lugato, E. & Motola, V. & Bodis, K. & Scarlat, N. & Dallemand, J.-F., 2015. "Optimal energy use of agricultural crop residues preserving soil organic carbon stocks in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 519-529.
    12. Santosh Korav & Gandhamanagenahalli A. Rajanna & Dharam Bir Yadav & Venkatesh Paramesha & Chandra Mohan Mehta & Prakash Kumar Jha & Surendra Singh & Shikha Singh, 2022. "Impacts of Mechanized Crop Residue Management on Rice-Wheat Cropping System—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Jian Sun & Tracy E. Twine & Jason Hill & Ryan Noe & Jiancheng Shi & Minmin Li, 2017. "Effects of Land Use Change for Crops on Water and Carbon Budgets in the Midwest USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Trindade, Federico J. & Fulginiti, Lilyan E. & Perrin, Richard K., 2020. "A half century of yield growth along the forty-first parallel of the Great Plains: factor intensification, irrigation, weather, and technical change," Staff Papers 305568, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    15. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Long Nguyen & Kara G. Cafferty & Erin M. Searcy & Sabrina Spatari, 2014. "Uncertainties in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Advanced Biomass Feedstock Logistics Supply Chains in Kansas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Alexandre Tisserant & Francesco Cherubini, 2019. "Potentials, Limitations, Co-Benefits, and Trade-Offs of Biochar Applications to Soils for Climate Change Mitigation," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-34, November.
    18. Zhao, Yan & Damgaard, Anders & Xu, Yingjie & Liu, Shan & Christensen, Thomas H., 2019. "Bioethanol from corn stover – Global warming footprint of alternative biotechnologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 237-253.
    19. Ji, Xi & Liu, Yifang & Meng, Jing & Wu, Xudong, 2020. "Global supply chain of biomass use and the shift of environmental welfare from primary exploiters to final consumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    20. Hoekman, S. Kent & Broch, Amber & Liu, Xiaowei (Vivian), 2018. "Environmental implications of higher ethanol production and use in the U.S.: A literature review. Part I – Impacts on water, soil, and air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3140-3158.
    21. Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Integrated Assessment of Economic Supply and Environmental Effects of Biomass Co-Firing in Coal Power Plants: A Case Study of Jiangsu, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    22. Trindade, F. & Fulginiti, L. & Perrin, R., 2018. "Irrigation and Climate Effects on Land Productivity in the U.S. Central Plains," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277264, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    23. Pontau, Patricia & Hou, Yi & Cai, Hua & Zhen, Yi & Jia, Xiaoping & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Xu, Ming, 2015. "Assessing land-use impacts by clean vehicle systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 112-119.
    24. Peng Zhang & Yuxin He & Tao Ren & Yang Wang & Chao Liu & Naiwen Li & Longguo Li, 2021. "The Crop Residue Removal Threshold Ensures Sustainable Agriculture in the Purple Soil Region of Sichuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    25. Dumortier, Jerome, 2015. "Impact of agronomic uncertainty in biomass production and endogenous commodity prices on cellulosic biofuel feedstock composition," IU SPEA AgEcon Papers 198707, Indiana University, IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:4:y:2014:i:5:d:10.1038_nclimate2187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.