IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v2y2012i12d10.1038_nclimate1742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equity and state representations in climate negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Heike Schroeder

    (University of East Anglia, School of International Development, Norwich Research Park)

  • Maxwell T. Boykoff

    (University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), Center for Science and Technology Policy Research (CSTPR), UCB 488 CIRES CSTPR)

  • Laura Spiers

    (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Sustainability and Climate Change)

Abstract

Current United Nations structures are highly inequitable and obstruct progress towards international climate policy co-operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Heike Schroeder & Maxwell T. Boykoff & Laura Spiers, 2012. "Equity and state representations in climate negotiations," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 834-836, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:2:y:2012:i:12:d:10.1038_nclimate1742
    DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1742
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nclimate1742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin Grecksch & Carola Klöck, 0. "Access and allocation in climate change adaptation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    2. Vaclav Vlcek, 2023. "Who cares about the UN General Assembly? National delegations size from 1993 to 2016," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 349-360, May.
    3. Agni Kalfagianni & Simon Meisch, 2020. "Epistemological and ethical understandings of access and allocation in Earth System Governance: a 10-year review of the literature," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 203-221, June.
    4. Marcel Hanegraaff & Arlo Poletti, 2021. "It's economic size, stupid! How global advocacy mirrors state power," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1326-1349, October.
    5. Kevin Grecksch & Carola Klöck, 2020. "Access and allocation in climate change adaptation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 271-286, June.
    6. Brendan Coolsaet & John Pitseys, 2015. "Fair and Equitable Negotiations? African Influence and the International Access and Benefit-Sharing Regime," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(2), pages 38-56, May.
    7. Jonathan W. Kuyper & Karin Bäckstrand, 2016. "Accountability and Representation: Nonstate Actors in UN Climate Diplomacy," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(2), pages 61-81, May.
    8. Carole‐Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann, 2021. "In Whose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 581-591, November.
    9. Elisa Calliari & Jaroslav Mysiak & Lisa Vanhala, 2020. "A digital climate summit to maintain Paris Agreement ambition," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(6), pages 480-480, June.
    10. Johannes Kruse, 2014. "Women’s representation in the UN climate change negotiations: a quantitative analysis of state delegations, 1995–2011," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 349-370, November.
    11. Michaël Aklin & Matto Mildenberger, 2020. "Prisoners of the Wrong Dilemma: Why Distributive Conflict, Not Collective Action, Characterizes the Politics of Climate Change," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 4-27, Autumn.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:2:y:2012:i:12:d:10.1038_nclimate1742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.