Author
Listed:
- Tuan Minh Pham
(a Section for the Science of Complex Systems, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;; b Complexity Science Hub, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;)
- Jan Korbel
(a Section for the Science of Complex Systems, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;; b Complexity Science Hub, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;)
- Rudolf Hanel
(a Section for the Science of Complex Systems, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;; b Complexity Science Hub, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;)
- Stefan Thurner
(a Section for the Science of Complex Systems, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;; b Complexity Science Hub, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;; c Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501)
Abstract
Social stability is often associated with triangular interactions between people. Various possible social triangles appear in peculiar ratios. The triangles “The friend of my friend is my friend” and “The enemy of my friend is my enemy” are strongly overrepresented, which plays an important role for social balance. A standard explanation for these characteristic triangle fractions is that people consider triadic information before forming social relations. This assumption often contradicts everyday experience. We propose an explanation of the observed overrepresentations without individuals having to consider triangles. A society where individuals minimize their social stress self-organizes toward the empirically observed triangular structures. We demonstrate this with data from a society of computer game players, where triangle formation can be directly observed.
Suggested Citation
Tuan Minh Pham & Jan Korbel & Rudolf Hanel & Stefan Thurner, 2022.
"Empirical social triad statistics can be explained with dyadic homophylic interactions,"
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(6), pages 2121103119-, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2121103119
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Meng, Fanyuan & Zhu, Jiadong & Yao, Yuheng & Fenoaltea, Enrico Maria & Xie, Yubo & Yang, Pingle & Liu, Run-Ran & Zhang, Jianlin, 2023.
"Disagreement and fragmentation in growing groups,"
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2121103119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: PNAS Product Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.