IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v118y2021pe2101967118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube

Author

Listed:
  • Homa Hosseinmardi

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104)

  • Amir Ghasemian

    (Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Department of Statistical Science, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122)

  • Aaron Clauset

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501)

  • Markus Mobius

    (Microsoft Research New England, Cambridge, MA 02142)

  • David M. Rothschild

    (Microsoft Research New York, New York, NY 10012)

  • Duncan J. Watts

    (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; The Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Operations, Information, and Decisions Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104)

Abstract

Although it is under-studied relative to other social media platforms, YouTube is arguably the largest and most engaging online media consumption platform in the world. Recently, YouTube’s scale has fueled concerns that YouTube users are being radicalized via a combination of biased recommendations and ostensibly apolitical “anti-woke” channels, both of which have been claimed to direct attention to radical political content. Here we test this hypothesis using a representative panel of more than 300,000 Americans and their individual-level browsing behavior, on and off YouTube, from January 2016 through December 2019. Using a labeled set of political news channels, we find that news consumption on YouTube is dominated by mainstream and largely centrist sources. Consumers of far-right content, while more engaged than average, represent a small and stable percentage of news consumers. However, consumption of “anti-woke” content, defined in terms of its opposition to progressive intellectual and political agendas, grew steadily in popularity and is correlated with consumption of far-right content off-platform. We find no evidence that engagement with far-right content is caused by YouTube recommendations systematically, nor do we find clear evidence that anti-woke channels serve as a gateway to the far right. Rather, consumption of political content on YouTube appears to reflect individual preferences that extend across the web as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Homa Hosseinmardi & Amir Ghasemian & Aaron Clauset & Markus Mobius & David M. Rothschild & Duncan J. Watts, 2021. "Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(32), pages 2101967118-, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2101967118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/118/32/e2101967118.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2101967118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.