IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v118y2021pe2015124118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supportive management practice and intrinsic motivation go together in the public service

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Honig

    (Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC 20036)

Abstract

Drawing on over 4,000,000 individual and 2,000 agency observations across five countries, this paper examines the relationship between features of an employee’s work environment and intrinsic motivation in public agencies. It finds that practices which foster employees’ sense of autonomy, competence, and relatedness are associated with substantially higher levels of intrinsic motivation across a broad range of settings. This is true both at the individual and agency level and when examining changes within agency over time. These patterns appear to be at least partially a result of differential selection in and out of the agency, with lower levels of supportive practices associated with greater desire to exit for employees with higher levels of intrinsic motivation. Nonfinancial elements of job design are strongly associated with intrinsic motivation, as are potentially more difficult to alter features of an agency, such as satisfaction with compensation and managerial quality. There is also suggestive evidence that the relationship between agency practices and employee intrinsic motivation is stronger when tasks are more difficult to monitor.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Honig, 2021. "Supportive management practice and intrinsic motivation go together in the public service," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(13), pages 2015124118-, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2015124118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/118/13/e2015124118.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:118:y:2021:p:e2015124118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.