IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p24165-24172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fifty years of capacity building in the search for new marine natural products

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel C. Leal

    (ECOMARE - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-19 Aveiro, Portugal; Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Center for Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland)

  • Jaime M. Anaya-Rojas

    (Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany)

  • Murray H. G. Munro

    (School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

  • John W. Blunt

    (School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

  • Carlos J. Melian

    (Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Center for Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland)

  • Ricardo Calado

    (ECOMARE - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-19 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Moritz D. Lürig

    (Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Center for Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland; Department of Aquatic Ecology, Center for Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland)

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Nagoya Protocol in particular, provide a framework for the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of biological resources and traditional knowledge, and ultimately aim to promote capacity-building in the developing world. However, measuring capacity-building is a challenging task due to its intangible nature. By compiling and analyzing a database of scientific peer-reviewed publications over a period of 50 y (1965 to 2015), we investigated capacity-building in global marine natural product discovery. We used publication and authorship metrics to assess how the capacity to become scientifically proficient, prolific, and independent has changed in bioprospecting countries. Our results show that marine bioprospecting is a dynamically growing field of research with continuously increasing numbers of participating countries, publications, and scientists. Yet despite longstanding efforts to promote equitability and scientific independence, not all countries have similarly increased their capacity to explore marine biodiversity within their national jurisdiction areas. Although developing countries show an increasing trend in the number of publications, a few developed countries still account for almost one-half of all publications in the field. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that economic capacity affects how well countries with species-rich marine ecosystems can scientifically explore those resources. Overall, the capacity-building data analyzed here provides a timely contribution to the ongoing international debate about access to and benefit-sharing of biological resources for countries exploring biodiversity within and outside their national jurisdiction areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel C. Leal & Jaime M. Anaya-Rojas & Murray H. G. Munro & John W. Blunt & Carlos J. Melian & Ricardo Calado & Moritz D. Lürig, 2020. "Fifty years of capacity building in the search for new marine natural products," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(39), pages 24165-24172, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:24165-24172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/39/24165.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:24165-24172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.