Author
Listed:
- Adam Sheridan
(Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Finance Institute, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)
- Asger Lau Andersen
(Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Finance Institute, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)
- Emil Toft Hansen
(Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark)
- Niels Johannesen
(Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Finance Institute, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)
Abstract
This paper uses real-time transaction data from a large bank in Scandinavia to estimate the effect of social distancing laws on consumer spending in the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The analysis exploits a natural experiment to disentangle the effects of the virus and the laws aiming to contain it: Denmark and Sweden were similarly exposed to the pandemic but only Denmark imposed significant restrictions on social and economic activities. We estimate that aggregate spending dropped by around 25% (95% CI: 24 to 26%) in Sweden and, as a result of the shutdown, by 4 additional percentage points (95% CI: 3 to 5 percentage points [p.p.]) in Denmark. This suggests that most of the economic contraction is caused by the virus itself and occurs regardless of social distancing laws. The age gradient in the estimates suggests that social distancing reinforces the virus-induced drop in spending for low-health-risk individuals but attenuates it for high-risk individuals by lowering the overall prevalence of the virus in the society.
Suggested Citation
Adam Sheridan & Asger Lau Andersen & Emil Toft Hansen & Niels Johannesen, 2020.
"Social distancing laws cause only small losses of economic activity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Scandinavia,"
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(34), pages 20468-20473, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:20468-20473
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:20468-20473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.