IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p17688-17694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying and explaining variation in life expectancy at census tract, county, and state levels in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Fernando Boing

    (Post-Graduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, 88034495 Florianópolis, Brazil; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115)

  • Alexandra Crispim Boing

    (Post-Graduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, 88034495 Florianópolis, Brazil; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115)

  • Jack Cordes

    (Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115)

  • Rockli Kim

    (Division of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul 02841, South Korea; Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul 02841, South Korea; Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA 02138)

  • S. V. Subramanian

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115; Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA 02138)

Abstract

Studies on geographic inequalities in life expectancy in the United States have exclusively focused on single-level analyses of aggregated data at state or county level. This study develops a multilevel perspective to understanding variation in life expectancy by simultaneously modeling the geographic variation at the levels of census tracts (CTs), counties, and states. We analyzed data from 65,662 CTs, nested within 3,020 counties and 48 states (plus District of Columbia). The dependent variable was age-specific life expectancy observed in each of the CTs. We also considered the following CT-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics as independent variables: population density; proportions of population who are black, who are single parents, who are below the federal poverty line, and who are aged 25 or older who have a bachelor's degree or higher; and median household income. Of the total geographic variation in life expectancy at birth, 70.4% of the variation was attributed to CTs, followed by 19.0% for states and 10.7% for counties. The relative importance of CTs was greater for life expectancy at older ages (70.4 to 96.8%). The CT-level independent variables explained 5 to 76.6% of between-state variation, 11.1 to 58.6% of between-county variation, and 0.7 to 44.9% of between-CT variation in life expectancy across different age groups. Our findings indicate that population inequalities in longevity in the United States are primarily a local phenomenon. There is a need for greater precision and targeting of local geographies in public policy discourse aimed at reducing health inequalities in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Fernando Boing & Alexandra Crispim Boing & Jack Cordes & Rockli Kim & S. V. Subramanian, 2020. "Quantifying and explaining variation in life expectancy at census tract, county, and state levels in the United States," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(30), pages 17688-17694, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:17688-17694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/30/17688.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thayer Alshaabi & David R Dewhurst & James P Bagrow & Peter S Dodds & Christopher M Danforth, 2021. "The sociospatial factors of death: Analyzing effects of geospatially-distributed variables in a Bayesian mortality model for Hong Kong," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:17688-17694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.