IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v115y2018p10299-10304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized least squares can overcome the critical threshold in respondent-driven sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastien Roch

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706)

  • Karl Rohe

    (Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706)

Abstract

To sample marginalized and/or hard-to-reach populations, respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and similar techniques reach their participants via peer referral. Under a Markov model for RDS, previous research has shown that if the typical participant refers too many contacts, then the variance of common estimators does not decay like O ( n − 1 ) , where n is the sample size. This implies that confidence intervals will be far wider than under a typical sampling design. Here we show that generalized least squares (GLS) can effectively reduce the variance of RDS estimates. In particular, a theoretical analysis indicates that the variance of the GLS estimator is O ( n − 1 ) . We then derive two classes of feasible GLS estimators. The first class is based upon a Degree Corrected Stochastic Blockmodel for the underlying social network. The second class is based upon a rank-two model. It might be of independent interest that in both model classes, the theoretical results show that it is possible to estimate the spectral properties of the population network from a random walk sample of the nodes. These theoretical results point the way to entirely different classes of estimators that account for the network structure beyond node degree. Diagnostic plots help to identify situations where feasible GLS estimators are more appropriate. The computational experiments show the potential benefits and also indicate that there is room to further develop these estimators in practical settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastien Roch & Karl Rohe, 2018. "Generalized least squares can overcome the critical threshold in respondent-driven sampling," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(41), pages 10299-10304, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:10299-10304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/115/41/10299.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:10299-10304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.